The Jury and Abjury of My Peers: The Self in Face and Dignity Cultures

Young Hoon Kim, Dov Cohen, Wing Tung Au

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

64 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The self is defined and judged differently by people from face and dignity cultures (in this case, Hong Kong and the United States, respectively). Across 3 experiments, people from a face culture absorbed the judgments of other people into their private self-definitions. Particularly important for people from a face culture are public representations-knowledge that is shared and known to be shared about someone. In contrast, people from a dignity culture try to preserve the sovereign self by not letting others define them. In the 3 experiments, dignity culture participants showed a studied indifference to the judgments of their peers, ignoring peers' assessments-whether those assessments were public or private, were positive or negative, or were made by qualified peers or unqualified peers. Ways that the self is " knotted" up with social judgments and cultural imperatives are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)904-916
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Personality and Social Psychology
Volume98
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010 Jun

Fingerprint

Hong Kong
social judgement
experiment

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{d2bc77995d554146a8a272b75a6d8d38,
title = "The Jury and Abjury of My Peers: The Self in Face and Dignity Cultures",
abstract = "The self is defined and judged differently by people from face and dignity cultures (in this case, Hong Kong and the United States, respectively). Across 3 experiments, people from a face culture absorbed the judgments of other people into their private self-definitions. Particularly important for people from a face culture are public representations-knowledge that is shared and known to be shared about someone. In contrast, people from a dignity culture try to preserve the sovereign self by not letting others define them. In the 3 experiments, dignity culture participants showed a studied indifference to the judgments of their peers, ignoring peers' assessments-whether those assessments were public or private, were positive or negative, or were made by qualified peers or unqualified peers. Ways that the self is {"} knotted{"} up with social judgments and cultural imperatives are discussed.",
author = "Kim, {Young Hoon} and Dov Cohen and Au, {Wing Tung}",
year = "2010",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1037/a0017936",
language = "English",
volume = "98",
pages = "904--916",
journal = "Journal of Personality and Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-3514",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "6",

}

The Jury and Abjury of My Peers : The Self in Face and Dignity Cultures. / Kim, Young Hoon; Cohen, Dov; Au, Wing Tung.

In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 98, No. 6, 06.2010, p. 904-916.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Jury and Abjury of My Peers

T2 - The Self in Face and Dignity Cultures

AU - Kim, Young Hoon

AU - Cohen, Dov

AU - Au, Wing Tung

PY - 2010/6

Y1 - 2010/6

N2 - The self is defined and judged differently by people from face and dignity cultures (in this case, Hong Kong and the United States, respectively). Across 3 experiments, people from a face culture absorbed the judgments of other people into their private self-definitions. Particularly important for people from a face culture are public representations-knowledge that is shared and known to be shared about someone. In contrast, people from a dignity culture try to preserve the sovereign self by not letting others define them. In the 3 experiments, dignity culture participants showed a studied indifference to the judgments of their peers, ignoring peers' assessments-whether those assessments were public or private, were positive or negative, or were made by qualified peers or unqualified peers. Ways that the self is " knotted" up with social judgments and cultural imperatives are discussed.

AB - The self is defined and judged differently by people from face and dignity cultures (in this case, Hong Kong and the United States, respectively). Across 3 experiments, people from a face culture absorbed the judgments of other people into their private self-definitions. Particularly important for people from a face culture are public representations-knowledge that is shared and known to be shared about someone. In contrast, people from a dignity culture try to preserve the sovereign self by not letting others define them. In the 3 experiments, dignity culture participants showed a studied indifference to the judgments of their peers, ignoring peers' assessments-whether those assessments were public or private, were positive or negative, or were made by qualified peers or unqualified peers. Ways that the self is " knotted" up with social judgments and cultural imperatives are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77954789700&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77954789700&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0017936

DO - 10.1037/a0017936

M3 - Article

C2 - 20515246

AN - SCOPUS:77954789700

VL - 98

SP - 904

EP - 916

JO - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

SN - 0022-3514

IS - 6

ER -