The missing button sign as a tool for detecting proximal internal carotid artery occlusion

Jun Young Choi, Eun Jin Kim, Ho Sung Kim, In Soo Joo, Kyoon Huh, philhyu Lee, Jihoe Heo, Hyo Suk Nam

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to develop a simple and reliable sign for detecting proximal internal carotid artery occlusion (ICAO) using conventional CT scanning. The missing button sign (MBS) is defined as the absence of the ICA at the level of the foramen magnum on contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) scans. Two raters independently reviewed random CECT samples from consecutive patients with acute ischaemic stroke. A total of 399 patients with 798 carotid arteries were analysed. Rater A identified the MBS in 41 (5%) of the carotid arteries, and did not identify the MBS in 735 (92%) carotid arteries. Rater B identified the MBS in 45 (6%) of the arteries, and lack of the MBS in 731 (91%) arteries. The kappa value for agreement was 0.90 (95% CI 0.84-0.95). Compared with CT angiography, Rater A's sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for detecting proximal ICAO were 85%, 100%, 100%, and 99%, respectively, while Rater B's values were 87%, 99%, 93%, and 99%, respectively. This study indicated that the MBS on CECT scanning is both a consistent and specific tool for the early identification of proximal ICAO.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1506-1509
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Clinical Neuroscience
Volume17
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010 Dec 1

Fingerprint

Internal Carotid Artery
Carotid Arteries
Arteries
Foramen Magnum
Angiography
Stroke
Sensitivity and Specificity

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Choi, Jun Young ; Kim, Eun Jin ; Kim, Ho Sung ; Joo, In Soo ; Huh, Kyoon ; Lee, philhyu ; Heo, Jihoe ; Nam, Hyo Suk. / The missing button sign as a tool for detecting proximal internal carotid artery occlusion. In: Journal of Clinical Neuroscience. 2010 ; Vol. 17, No. 12. pp. 1506-1509.
@article{853b1e90412f4925a796235c03e5ac39,
title = "The missing button sign as a tool for detecting proximal internal carotid artery occlusion",
abstract = "The aim of this study was to develop a simple and reliable sign for detecting proximal internal carotid artery occlusion (ICAO) using conventional CT scanning. The missing button sign (MBS) is defined as the absence of the ICA at the level of the foramen magnum on contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) scans. Two raters independently reviewed random CECT samples from consecutive patients with acute ischaemic stroke. A total of 399 patients with 798 carotid arteries were analysed. Rater A identified the MBS in 41 (5{\%}) of the carotid arteries, and did not identify the MBS in 735 (92{\%}) carotid arteries. Rater B identified the MBS in 45 (6{\%}) of the arteries, and lack of the MBS in 731 (91{\%}) arteries. The kappa value for agreement was 0.90 (95{\%} CI 0.84-0.95). Compared with CT angiography, Rater A's sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for detecting proximal ICAO were 85{\%}, 100{\%}, 100{\%}, and 99{\%}, respectively, while Rater B's values were 87{\%}, 99{\%}, 93{\%}, and 99{\%}, respectively. This study indicated that the MBS on CECT scanning is both a consistent and specific tool for the early identification of proximal ICAO.",
author = "Choi, {Jun Young} and Kim, {Eun Jin} and Kim, {Ho Sung} and Joo, {In Soo} and Kyoon Huh and philhyu Lee and Jihoe Heo and Nam, {Hyo Suk}",
year = "2010",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jocn.2010.03.050",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "1506--1509",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Neuroscience",
issn = "0967-5868",
publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",
number = "12",

}

The missing button sign as a tool for detecting proximal internal carotid artery occlusion. / Choi, Jun Young; Kim, Eun Jin; Kim, Ho Sung; Joo, In Soo; Huh, Kyoon; Lee, philhyu; Heo, Jihoe; Nam, Hyo Suk.

In: Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, Vol. 17, No. 12, 01.12.2010, p. 1506-1509.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The missing button sign as a tool for detecting proximal internal carotid artery occlusion

AU - Choi, Jun Young

AU - Kim, Eun Jin

AU - Kim, Ho Sung

AU - Joo, In Soo

AU - Huh, Kyoon

AU - Lee, philhyu

AU - Heo, Jihoe

AU - Nam, Hyo Suk

PY - 2010/12/1

Y1 - 2010/12/1

N2 - The aim of this study was to develop a simple and reliable sign for detecting proximal internal carotid artery occlusion (ICAO) using conventional CT scanning. The missing button sign (MBS) is defined as the absence of the ICA at the level of the foramen magnum on contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) scans. Two raters independently reviewed random CECT samples from consecutive patients with acute ischaemic stroke. A total of 399 patients with 798 carotid arteries were analysed. Rater A identified the MBS in 41 (5%) of the carotid arteries, and did not identify the MBS in 735 (92%) carotid arteries. Rater B identified the MBS in 45 (6%) of the arteries, and lack of the MBS in 731 (91%) arteries. The kappa value for agreement was 0.90 (95% CI 0.84-0.95). Compared with CT angiography, Rater A's sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for detecting proximal ICAO were 85%, 100%, 100%, and 99%, respectively, while Rater B's values were 87%, 99%, 93%, and 99%, respectively. This study indicated that the MBS on CECT scanning is both a consistent and specific tool for the early identification of proximal ICAO.

AB - The aim of this study was to develop a simple and reliable sign for detecting proximal internal carotid artery occlusion (ICAO) using conventional CT scanning. The missing button sign (MBS) is defined as the absence of the ICA at the level of the foramen magnum on contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) scans. Two raters independently reviewed random CECT samples from consecutive patients with acute ischaemic stroke. A total of 399 patients with 798 carotid arteries were analysed. Rater A identified the MBS in 41 (5%) of the carotid arteries, and did not identify the MBS in 735 (92%) carotid arteries. Rater B identified the MBS in 45 (6%) of the arteries, and lack of the MBS in 731 (91%) arteries. The kappa value for agreement was 0.90 (95% CI 0.84-0.95). Compared with CT angiography, Rater A's sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for detecting proximal ICAO were 85%, 100%, 100%, and 99%, respectively, while Rater B's values were 87%, 99%, 93%, and 99%, respectively. This study indicated that the MBS on CECT scanning is both a consistent and specific tool for the early identification of proximal ICAO.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78049460954&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78049460954&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jocn.2010.03.050

DO - 10.1016/j.jocn.2010.03.050

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 1506

EP - 1509

JO - Journal of Clinical Neuroscience

JF - Journal of Clinical Neuroscience

SN - 0967-5868

IS - 12

ER -