The Neural Fate of Consciously Perceived and Missed Events in the Attentional Blink

René Marois, Do Joon Yi, Marvin M. Chun

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

221 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Cognitive models of attention propose that visual perception is a product of two stages of visual processing: early operations permit rapid initial categorization of the visual world, while later attention-demanding capacity-limited stages are necessary for the conscious report of the stimuli. Here we used the attentional blink paradigm and fMRI to neurally distinguish these two stages of vision. Subjects detected a face target and a scene target presented rapidly among distractors at fixation. Although the second, scene target frequently went undetected by the subjects, it nonetheless activated regions of the medial temporal cortex involved in high-level scene representations, the parahippocampal place area (PPA). This PPA activation was amplified when the stimulus was consciously perceived. By contrast, the frontal cortex was activated only when scenes were successfully reported. These results suggest that medial temporal cortex permits rapid categorization of the visual input, while the frontal cortex is part of a capacity-limited attentional bottleneck to conscious report.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)465-472
Number of pages8
JournalNeuron
Volume41
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2004 Feb 5

Fingerprint

Attentional Blink
Frontal Lobe
Temporal Lobe
Visual Perception
Magnetic Resonance Imaging

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Marois, René ; Yi, Do Joon ; Chun, Marvin M. / The Neural Fate of Consciously Perceived and Missed Events in the Attentional Blink. In: Neuron. 2004 ; Vol. 41, No. 3. pp. 465-472.
@article{4b5700141b814211ab552e78c72eb2b0,
title = "The Neural Fate of Consciously Perceived and Missed Events in the Attentional Blink",
abstract = "Cognitive models of attention propose that visual perception is a product of two stages of visual processing: early operations permit rapid initial categorization of the visual world, while later attention-demanding capacity-limited stages are necessary for the conscious report of the stimuli. Here we used the attentional blink paradigm and fMRI to neurally distinguish these two stages of vision. Subjects detected a face target and a scene target presented rapidly among distractors at fixation. Although the second, scene target frequently went undetected by the subjects, it nonetheless activated regions of the medial temporal cortex involved in high-level scene representations, the parahippocampal place area (PPA). This PPA activation was amplified when the stimulus was consciously perceived. By contrast, the frontal cortex was activated only when scenes were successfully reported. These results suggest that medial temporal cortex permits rapid categorization of the visual input, while the frontal cortex is part of a capacity-limited attentional bottleneck to conscious report.",
author = "Ren{\'e} Marois and Yi, {Do Joon} and Chun, {Marvin M.}",
year = "2004",
month = "2",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1016/S0896-6273(04)00012-1",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "465--472",
journal = "Neuron",
issn = "0896-6273",
publisher = "Cell Press",
number = "3",

}

The Neural Fate of Consciously Perceived and Missed Events in the Attentional Blink. / Marois, René; Yi, Do Joon; Chun, Marvin M.

In: Neuron, Vol. 41, No. 3, 05.02.2004, p. 465-472.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Neural Fate of Consciously Perceived and Missed Events in the Attentional Blink

AU - Marois, René

AU - Yi, Do Joon

AU - Chun, Marvin M.

PY - 2004/2/5

Y1 - 2004/2/5

N2 - Cognitive models of attention propose that visual perception is a product of two stages of visual processing: early operations permit rapid initial categorization of the visual world, while later attention-demanding capacity-limited stages are necessary for the conscious report of the stimuli. Here we used the attentional blink paradigm and fMRI to neurally distinguish these two stages of vision. Subjects detected a face target and a scene target presented rapidly among distractors at fixation. Although the second, scene target frequently went undetected by the subjects, it nonetheless activated regions of the medial temporal cortex involved in high-level scene representations, the parahippocampal place area (PPA). This PPA activation was amplified when the stimulus was consciously perceived. By contrast, the frontal cortex was activated only when scenes were successfully reported. These results suggest that medial temporal cortex permits rapid categorization of the visual input, while the frontal cortex is part of a capacity-limited attentional bottleneck to conscious report.

AB - Cognitive models of attention propose that visual perception is a product of two stages of visual processing: early operations permit rapid initial categorization of the visual world, while later attention-demanding capacity-limited stages are necessary for the conscious report of the stimuli. Here we used the attentional blink paradigm and fMRI to neurally distinguish these two stages of vision. Subjects detected a face target and a scene target presented rapidly among distractors at fixation. Although the second, scene target frequently went undetected by the subjects, it nonetheless activated regions of the medial temporal cortex involved in high-level scene representations, the parahippocampal place area (PPA). This PPA activation was amplified when the stimulus was consciously perceived. By contrast, the frontal cortex was activated only when scenes were successfully reported. These results suggest that medial temporal cortex permits rapid categorization of the visual input, while the frontal cortex is part of a capacity-limited attentional bottleneck to conscious report.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1242316146&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1242316146&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0896-6273(04)00012-1

DO - 10.1016/S0896-6273(04)00012-1

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 465

EP - 472

JO - Neuron

JF - Neuron

SN - 0896-6273

IS - 3

ER -