The perception of ginseng in England and America, 1600-1800

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

This paper aims to redress serious imbalances in the research on ginseng. Most accounts of ginseng treat it as an exclusively East Asian commodity, and are dominated by the natural sciences. Ginseng, however, was much discussed in England and America in the early modern period: the discussion encompassed not only botanical and medical interests, but also discourses on the commercial marketability of ginseng; ginseng was also an item that embodied European prejudices, symbolizing perceived 'differences' between the West and East. As such, ginseng was an 'indigenous' item of 'the East' that was much discussed in 'the West', but one that resisted assimilation into its systems of knowledge.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)273-308
Number of pages36
JournalKorean Journal of Medical History
Volume25
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Aug 1

Fingerprint

Panax
England
Natural Science Disciplines
Botany
Discourse
Prejudice
Asia
Commodities
Natural Science
Research

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Cite this

@article{d5c52334157c452596ecf0017261b6cf,
title = "The perception of ginseng in England and America, 1600-1800",
abstract = "This paper aims to redress serious imbalances in the research on ginseng. Most accounts of ginseng treat it as an exclusively East Asian commodity, and are dominated by the natural sciences. Ginseng, however, was much discussed in England and America in the early modern period: the discussion encompassed not only botanical and medical interests, but also discourses on the commercial marketability of ginseng; ginseng was also an item that embodied European prejudices, symbolizing perceived 'differences' between the West and East. As such, ginseng was an 'indigenous' item of 'the East' that was much discussed in 'the West', but one that resisted assimilation into its systems of knowledge.",
author = "Heasim Sul",
year = "2016",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.13081/kjmh.2016.25.273",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "273--308",
journal = "Korean Journal of Medical History",
issn = "1225-505X",
publisher = "Korean Society for the History of Medicine",
number = "2",

}

The perception of ginseng in England and America, 1600-1800. / Sul, Heasim.

In: Korean Journal of Medical History, Vol. 25, No. 2, 01.08.2016, p. 273-308.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - The perception of ginseng in England and America, 1600-1800

AU - Sul, Heasim

PY - 2016/8/1

Y1 - 2016/8/1

N2 - This paper aims to redress serious imbalances in the research on ginseng. Most accounts of ginseng treat it as an exclusively East Asian commodity, and are dominated by the natural sciences. Ginseng, however, was much discussed in England and America in the early modern period: the discussion encompassed not only botanical and medical interests, but also discourses on the commercial marketability of ginseng; ginseng was also an item that embodied European prejudices, symbolizing perceived 'differences' between the West and East. As such, ginseng was an 'indigenous' item of 'the East' that was much discussed in 'the West', but one that resisted assimilation into its systems of knowledge.

AB - This paper aims to redress serious imbalances in the research on ginseng. Most accounts of ginseng treat it as an exclusively East Asian commodity, and are dominated by the natural sciences. Ginseng, however, was much discussed in England and America in the early modern period: the discussion encompassed not only botanical and medical interests, but also discourses on the commercial marketability of ginseng; ginseng was also an item that embodied European prejudices, symbolizing perceived 'differences' between the West and East. As such, ginseng was an 'indigenous' item of 'the East' that was much discussed in 'the West', but one that resisted assimilation into its systems of knowledge.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84989321822&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84989321822&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.13081/kjmh.2016.25.273

DO - 10.13081/kjmh.2016.25.273

M3 - Review article

VL - 25

SP - 273

EP - 308

JO - Korean Journal of Medical History

JF - Korean Journal of Medical History

SN - 1225-505X

IS - 2

ER -