The practical absolute: Fichte's hidden poetics

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The following paper argues that J.G. Fichte, despite his apparent philosophical neglect of art and aesthetics, does develop a strong, original, and coherent account of art, which not only allows the theorization of modern, non-representative art forms, but indeed anticipates Nietzsche and Heidegger in conceiving of truth in terms of art rather than scientific rationality. While the basis of Fichte's philosophy of art is presented in the essay "On Spirit and Letter in Philosophy," it is not developed systematically either in this text or anywhere else in his writings, but must be reconstructed through a broad consideration of all his works, including, above all, his political and economic writings. For Fichte, the art-work does not exist as an object possessing "aesthetic value" and which can, in turn, be possessed, consumed, and enjoyed through the subjective act of aesthetic experience. Rather, it involves a mode of praxis which, grounded in a radical and original power of imagination, creatively discloses possibilities for future forms of existence, experience, and political community that cannot be theoretically anticipated. While Fichte cannot himself theorize specific forms of art, since the art that concerns him belongs to the future, we can, however, retrospectively try to understand non-representational painting and non-mimetic dance as concrete realizations of Fichte's art-work of the future. In this way, Fichte's philosophy of art ultimately suggests an alternative to Heidegger's understanding of the work of art as a projective institution of truth. Fichte suggests that the human body, rather than human language, is the fundamental medium of art.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)407-433
Number of pages27
JournalContinental Philosophy Review
Volume40
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2007 Dec 1

Fingerprint

Poetics
Johann Gottlieb Fichte
Art
Works of Art
Art Form
Martin Heidegger
Philosophy of Art
Praxis
Political Community
Friedrich Nietzsche
Aesthetics
Philosophy
Terms of Art
Economics
Human Body
Aesthetic Value
Neglect
Fundamental
Scientific Rationalism
Aesthetic Experience

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Philosophy

Cite this

@article{049975b4fff4414d985ea1a38dc4cf36,
title = "The practical absolute: Fichte's hidden poetics",
abstract = "The following paper argues that J.G. Fichte, despite his apparent philosophical neglect of art and aesthetics, does develop a strong, original, and coherent account of art, which not only allows the theorization of modern, non-representative art forms, but indeed anticipates Nietzsche and Heidegger in conceiving of truth in terms of art rather than scientific rationality. While the basis of Fichte's philosophy of art is presented in the essay {"}On Spirit and Letter in Philosophy,{"} it is not developed systematically either in this text or anywhere else in his writings, but must be reconstructed through a broad consideration of all his works, including, above all, his political and economic writings. For Fichte, the art-work does not exist as an object possessing {"}aesthetic value{"} and which can, in turn, be possessed, consumed, and enjoyed through the subjective act of aesthetic experience. Rather, it involves a mode of praxis which, grounded in a radical and original power of imagination, creatively discloses possibilities for future forms of existence, experience, and political community that cannot be theoretically anticipated. While Fichte cannot himself theorize specific forms of art, since the art that concerns him belongs to the future, we can, however, retrospectively try to understand non-representational painting and non-mimetic dance as concrete realizations of Fichte's art-work of the future. In this way, Fichte's philosophy of art ultimately suggests an alternative to Heidegger's understanding of the work of art as a projective institution of truth. Fichte suggests that the human body, rather than human language, is the fundamental medium of art.",
author = "Anthony Adler",
year = "2007",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11007-007-9065-2",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "407--433",
journal = "Continental Philosophy Review",
issn = "1387-2842",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "4",

}

The practical absolute : Fichte's hidden poetics. / Adler, Anthony.

In: Continental Philosophy Review, Vol. 40, No. 4, 01.12.2007, p. 407-433.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The practical absolute

T2 - Fichte's hidden poetics

AU - Adler, Anthony

PY - 2007/12/1

Y1 - 2007/12/1

N2 - The following paper argues that J.G. Fichte, despite his apparent philosophical neglect of art and aesthetics, does develop a strong, original, and coherent account of art, which not only allows the theorization of modern, non-representative art forms, but indeed anticipates Nietzsche and Heidegger in conceiving of truth in terms of art rather than scientific rationality. While the basis of Fichte's philosophy of art is presented in the essay "On Spirit and Letter in Philosophy," it is not developed systematically either in this text or anywhere else in his writings, but must be reconstructed through a broad consideration of all his works, including, above all, his political and economic writings. For Fichte, the art-work does not exist as an object possessing "aesthetic value" and which can, in turn, be possessed, consumed, and enjoyed through the subjective act of aesthetic experience. Rather, it involves a mode of praxis which, grounded in a radical and original power of imagination, creatively discloses possibilities for future forms of existence, experience, and political community that cannot be theoretically anticipated. While Fichte cannot himself theorize specific forms of art, since the art that concerns him belongs to the future, we can, however, retrospectively try to understand non-representational painting and non-mimetic dance as concrete realizations of Fichte's art-work of the future. In this way, Fichte's philosophy of art ultimately suggests an alternative to Heidegger's understanding of the work of art as a projective institution of truth. Fichte suggests that the human body, rather than human language, is the fundamental medium of art.

AB - The following paper argues that J.G. Fichte, despite his apparent philosophical neglect of art and aesthetics, does develop a strong, original, and coherent account of art, which not only allows the theorization of modern, non-representative art forms, but indeed anticipates Nietzsche and Heidegger in conceiving of truth in terms of art rather than scientific rationality. While the basis of Fichte's philosophy of art is presented in the essay "On Spirit and Letter in Philosophy," it is not developed systematically either in this text or anywhere else in his writings, but must be reconstructed through a broad consideration of all his works, including, above all, his political and economic writings. For Fichte, the art-work does not exist as an object possessing "aesthetic value" and which can, in turn, be possessed, consumed, and enjoyed through the subjective act of aesthetic experience. Rather, it involves a mode of praxis which, grounded in a radical and original power of imagination, creatively discloses possibilities for future forms of existence, experience, and political community that cannot be theoretically anticipated. While Fichte cannot himself theorize specific forms of art, since the art that concerns him belongs to the future, we can, however, retrospectively try to understand non-representational painting and non-mimetic dance as concrete realizations of Fichte's art-work of the future. In this way, Fichte's philosophy of art ultimately suggests an alternative to Heidegger's understanding of the work of art as a projective institution of truth. Fichte suggests that the human body, rather than human language, is the fundamental medium of art.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=37449026389&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=37449026389&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11007-007-9065-2

DO - 10.1007/s11007-007-9065-2

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:37449026389

VL - 40

SP - 407

EP - 433

JO - Continental Philosophy Review

JF - Continental Philosophy Review

SN - 1387-2842

IS - 4

ER -