The rise of co-authorship in social work scholarship: A longitudinal study of collaboration and article quality, 1989-2013

Bryan G. Victor, David R. Hodge, Brian E. Perron, Michael George Vaughn, Christopher P. Salas-Wright

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study examined two issues critical to the social work research enterprise: (i) trends in authorship within disciplinary social work journals and (ii) the relationship between the number of authors and article quality, as measured via dissemination in highimpact journals. Data for the study were collected from original articles (N = 33,330) harvested from eighty disciplinary journals between 1989 and 2013. The results indicate the mean number of authors per article increased from 1.67 in 1989 to a high of 2.39 in 2013. The share of sole-authored articles dropped from roughly 60 per cent in the early 1990s to 35 per cent in 2013. Co-authorship became the norm in 2002, with the median number of authors increasing to two. Finally, the relationship between mean authorship per article and journal quality was significant (rs = 0.35). The results imply that tenure and promotion standards that privilege sole authorship may be outdated and that social workers seeking to create and disseminate scholarship in high-impact journals may benefit from developing collaborative networks.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2201-2216
Number of pages16
JournalBritish Journal of Social Work
Volume47
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017 Dec 1

Fingerprint

Authorship
Social Work
Longitudinal Studies
longitudinal study
social work
work research
privilege
social worker
promotion
trend
Research

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Health(social science)
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Victor, Bryan G. ; Hodge, David R. ; Perron, Brian E. ; Vaughn, Michael George ; Salas-Wright, Christopher P. / The rise of co-authorship in social work scholarship : A longitudinal study of collaboration and article quality, 1989-2013. In: British Journal of Social Work. 2017 ; Vol. 47, No. 8. pp. 2201-2216.
@article{2f35bf1b4f3746ffac4a9d5bd8d6c15b,
title = "The rise of co-authorship in social work scholarship: A longitudinal study of collaboration and article quality, 1989-2013",
abstract = "This study examined two issues critical to the social work research enterprise: (i) trends in authorship within disciplinary social work journals and (ii) the relationship between the number of authors and article quality, as measured via dissemination in highimpact journals. Data for the study were collected from original articles (N = 33,330) harvested from eighty disciplinary journals between 1989 and 2013. The results indicate the mean number of authors per article increased from 1.67 in 1989 to a high of 2.39 in 2013. The share of sole-authored articles dropped from roughly 60 per cent in the early 1990s to 35 per cent in 2013. Co-authorship became the norm in 2002, with the median number of authors increasing to two. Finally, the relationship between mean authorship per article and journal quality was significant (rs = 0.35). The results imply that tenure and promotion standards that privilege sole authorship may be outdated and that social workers seeking to create and disseminate scholarship in high-impact journals may benefit from developing collaborative networks.",
author = "Victor, {Bryan G.} and Hodge, {David R.} and Perron, {Brian E.} and Vaughn, {Michael George} and Salas-Wright, {Christopher P.}",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/bjsw/bcw059",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "2201--2216",
journal = "British Journal of Social Work",
issn = "0045-3102",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "8",

}

The rise of co-authorship in social work scholarship : A longitudinal study of collaboration and article quality, 1989-2013. / Victor, Bryan G.; Hodge, David R.; Perron, Brian E.; Vaughn, Michael George; Salas-Wright, Christopher P.

In: British Journal of Social Work, Vol. 47, No. 8, 01.12.2017, p. 2201-2216.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The rise of co-authorship in social work scholarship

T2 - A longitudinal study of collaboration and article quality, 1989-2013

AU - Victor, Bryan G.

AU - Hodge, David R.

AU - Perron, Brian E.

AU - Vaughn, Michael George

AU - Salas-Wright, Christopher P.

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - This study examined two issues critical to the social work research enterprise: (i) trends in authorship within disciplinary social work journals and (ii) the relationship between the number of authors and article quality, as measured via dissemination in highimpact journals. Data for the study were collected from original articles (N = 33,330) harvested from eighty disciplinary journals between 1989 and 2013. The results indicate the mean number of authors per article increased from 1.67 in 1989 to a high of 2.39 in 2013. The share of sole-authored articles dropped from roughly 60 per cent in the early 1990s to 35 per cent in 2013. Co-authorship became the norm in 2002, with the median number of authors increasing to two. Finally, the relationship between mean authorship per article and journal quality was significant (rs = 0.35). The results imply that tenure and promotion standards that privilege sole authorship may be outdated and that social workers seeking to create and disseminate scholarship in high-impact journals may benefit from developing collaborative networks.

AB - This study examined two issues critical to the social work research enterprise: (i) trends in authorship within disciplinary social work journals and (ii) the relationship between the number of authors and article quality, as measured via dissemination in highimpact journals. Data for the study were collected from original articles (N = 33,330) harvested from eighty disciplinary journals between 1989 and 2013. The results indicate the mean number of authors per article increased from 1.67 in 1989 to a high of 2.39 in 2013. The share of sole-authored articles dropped from roughly 60 per cent in the early 1990s to 35 per cent in 2013. Co-authorship became the norm in 2002, with the median number of authors increasing to two. Finally, the relationship between mean authorship per article and journal quality was significant (rs = 0.35). The results imply that tenure and promotion standards that privilege sole authorship may be outdated and that social workers seeking to create and disseminate scholarship in high-impact journals may benefit from developing collaborative networks.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040095516&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85040095516&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/bjsw/bcw059

DO - 10.1093/bjsw/bcw059

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85040095516

VL - 47

SP - 2201

EP - 2216

JO - British Journal of Social Work

JF - British Journal of Social Work

SN - 0045-3102

IS - 8

ER -