The role of distance in inter-firm learning for global R&D alliances

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Although knowledge creation through global alliance s has been popular, the extant literature has shown mixed findings on the relationship between partner knowledge gap and inter-firm learning. The relationship becomes more complicated in the global context because international collaboration poses different types of distance constraints on inter-firm learning. We examine the link between partner knowledge gap and inter-firm learning, as well as the moderating effects of three types of distances namely, global-connectedness, cultural, and geographic distance, based on the dataset collected from 236 global research and development (R&D) alliances formed between U.S. firms and their global partners in the bioscience and pharmaceutical industry. Our results indica te that partner knowledge gap induces inter-firm learning, such that the rivalry within an alliance is possibly reduced. The three types of distance differ in their moderating roles in the relationship between partner knowledge gap and interfirm learning. Our study identifies multi-faceted effects of distance and highlights the contextual setting in international management in consideration of the distance effects.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)191-208
Number of pages18
JournalInternational Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research
Volume14
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Alliances
Inter-firm learning
Knowledge gap
Pharmaceutical industry
International management
Connectedness
Moderating effect
R&D alliances
Knowledge creation
Rivalry

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Business and International Management
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

@article{637b4f58c08b43779062d6c8535f0c5a,
title = "The role of distance in inter-firm learning for global R&D alliances",
abstract = "Although knowledge creation through global alliance s has been popular, the extant literature has shown mixed findings on the relationship between partner knowledge gap and inter-firm learning. The relationship becomes more complicated in the global context because international collaboration poses different types of distance constraints on inter-firm learning. We examine the link between partner knowledge gap and inter-firm learning, as well as the moderating effects of three types of distances namely, global-connectedness, cultural, and geographic distance, based on the dataset collected from 236 global research and development (R&D) alliances formed between U.S. firms and their global partners in the bioscience and pharmaceutical industry. Our results indica te that partner knowledge gap induces inter-firm learning, such that the rivalry within an alliance is possibly reduced. The three types of distance differ in their moderating roles in the relationship between partner knowledge gap and interfirm learning. Our study identifies multi-faceted effects of distance and highlights the contextual setting in international management in consideration of the distance effects.",
author = "Jung, {Tae Yong} and Jooyoung Kwak and Lan Jiang",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "191--208",
journal = "International Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research",
issn = "0972-7302",
publisher = "Serials Publications",
number = "1",

}

The role of distance in inter-firm learning for global R&D alliances. / Jung, Tae Yong; Kwak, Jooyoung; Jiang, Lan.

In: International Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research, Vol. 14, No. 1, 01.01.2016, p. 191-208.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of distance in inter-firm learning for global R&D alliances

AU - Jung, Tae Yong

AU - Kwak, Jooyoung

AU - Jiang, Lan

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Although knowledge creation through global alliance s has been popular, the extant literature has shown mixed findings on the relationship between partner knowledge gap and inter-firm learning. The relationship becomes more complicated in the global context because international collaboration poses different types of distance constraints on inter-firm learning. We examine the link between partner knowledge gap and inter-firm learning, as well as the moderating effects of three types of distances namely, global-connectedness, cultural, and geographic distance, based on the dataset collected from 236 global research and development (R&D) alliances formed between U.S. firms and their global partners in the bioscience and pharmaceutical industry. Our results indica te that partner knowledge gap induces inter-firm learning, such that the rivalry within an alliance is possibly reduced. The three types of distance differ in their moderating roles in the relationship between partner knowledge gap and interfirm learning. Our study identifies multi-faceted effects of distance and highlights the contextual setting in international management in consideration of the distance effects.

AB - Although knowledge creation through global alliance s has been popular, the extant literature has shown mixed findings on the relationship between partner knowledge gap and inter-firm learning. The relationship becomes more complicated in the global context because international collaboration poses different types of distance constraints on inter-firm learning. We examine the link between partner knowledge gap and inter-firm learning, as well as the moderating effects of three types of distances namely, global-connectedness, cultural, and geographic distance, based on the dataset collected from 236 global research and development (R&D) alliances formed between U.S. firms and their global partners in the bioscience and pharmaceutical industry. Our results indica te that partner knowledge gap induces inter-firm learning, such that the rivalry within an alliance is possibly reduced. The three types of distance differ in their moderating roles in the relationship between partner knowledge gap and interfirm learning. Our study identifies multi-faceted effects of distance and highlights the contextual setting in international management in consideration of the distance effects.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84971254159&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84971254159&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84971254159

VL - 14

SP - 191

EP - 208

JO - International Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research

JF - International Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research

SN - 0972-7302

IS - 1

ER -