The Role of Intra-Conglomerate Equity Investment: Evidence from Korean Business Groups

Doyeon Kim, Taehyun Kim, Taeyoon Sung

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper demonstrates that group-affiliated firms have financial attributes that are different from those of stand-alone firms and suggests that these differences are consistent with ex-post consequences of receiving equity investment (EI) in business groups. Therefore, intra-group EI serves as an important driver of these differences. The paper verifies the results by considering the case of Korea's EI regulation. EI recipients invest more, but are less profitable than firms receiving no such investment. Group-affiliated firms reduce their dividend payout and short-term debt after receiving EI. Finally, recipients increase capital investment when they perceive their EI to be persistent, and those receiving massive EI use funds differently from those receiving normal EI. The results suggest that massive EI may involve ownership-related intentions, not financial support.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)135-167
Number of pages33
JournalGlobal Economic Review
Volume42
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013 Jun 1

Fingerprint

equity
evidence
Group
firm
recipient
Business groups
Conglomerate
Equity
capital investment
Korea
indebtedness
driver
regulation

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Business and International Management
  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

@article{2a3435e4ebb24723a522aa87c08073b9,
title = "The Role of Intra-Conglomerate Equity Investment: Evidence from Korean Business Groups",
abstract = "This paper demonstrates that group-affiliated firms have financial attributes that are different from those of stand-alone firms and suggests that these differences are consistent with ex-post consequences of receiving equity investment (EI) in business groups. Therefore, intra-group EI serves as an important driver of these differences. The paper verifies the results by considering the case of Korea's EI regulation. EI recipients invest more, but are less profitable than firms receiving no such investment. Group-affiliated firms reduce their dividend payout and short-term debt after receiving EI. Finally, recipients increase capital investment when they perceive their EI to be persistent, and those receiving massive EI use funds differently from those receiving normal EI. The results suggest that massive EI may involve ownership-related intentions, not financial support.",
author = "Doyeon Kim and Taehyun Kim and Taeyoon Sung",
year = "2013",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/1226508X.2013.791473",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "135--167",
journal = "Global Economic Review",
issn = "1226-508X",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

The Role of Intra-Conglomerate Equity Investment : Evidence from Korean Business Groups. / Kim, Doyeon; Kim, Taehyun; Sung, Taeyoon.

In: Global Economic Review, Vol. 42, No. 2, 01.06.2013, p. 135-167.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Role of Intra-Conglomerate Equity Investment

T2 - Evidence from Korean Business Groups

AU - Kim, Doyeon

AU - Kim, Taehyun

AU - Sung, Taeyoon

PY - 2013/6/1

Y1 - 2013/6/1

N2 - This paper demonstrates that group-affiliated firms have financial attributes that are different from those of stand-alone firms and suggests that these differences are consistent with ex-post consequences of receiving equity investment (EI) in business groups. Therefore, intra-group EI serves as an important driver of these differences. The paper verifies the results by considering the case of Korea's EI regulation. EI recipients invest more, but are less profitable than firms receiving no such investment. Group-affiliated firms reduce their dividend payout and short-term debt after receiving EI. Finally, recipients increase capital investment when they perceive their EI to be persistent, and those receiving massive EI use funds differently from those receiving normal EI. The results suggest that massive EI may involve ownership-related intentions, not financial support.

AB - This paper demonstrates that group-affiliated firms have financial attributes that are different from those of stand-alone firms and suggests that these differences are consistent with ex-post consequences of receiving equity investment (EI) in business groups. Therefore, intra-group EI serves as an important driver of these differences. The paper verifies the results by considering the case of Korea's EI regulation. EI recipients invest more, but are less profitable than firms receiving no such investment. Group-affiliated firms reduce their dividend payout and short-term debt after receiving EI. Finally, recipients increase capital investment when they perceive their EI to be persistent, and those receiving massive EI use funds differently from those receiving normal EI. The results suggest that massive EI may involve ownership-related intentions, not financial support.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878656722&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84878656722&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/1226508X.2013.791473

DO - 10.1080/1226508X.2013.791473

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84878656722

VL - 42

SP - 135

EP - 167

JO - Global Economic Review

JF - Global Economic Review

SN - 1226-508X

IS - 2

ER -