The role of spatial working memory in visual search efficiency

Sei Hwan Oh, Min Shik Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

134 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Many theories have proposed that visual working memory plays an important role in visual search. In contrast, by showing that a nonspatial working memory load did not interfere with search efficiency, Woodman, Vogel, and Luck (2001) recently proposed that the role of working memory in visual search is insignificant. However, the visual search process may interfere with spatial working memory. In the present study, a visual search task was performed concurrently with either a spatial working memory task (Experiment 1) or a nonspatial working memory task (Experiment 2). We found that the visual search process interfered with a spatial working memory load, but not with a nonspatial working memory load. These results suggest that there is a distinction between spatial and nonspatial working memory in terms of interactions with visual search tasks. These results imply that the visual search process and spatial working memory storage require the same limited-capacity mechanisms.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)275-281
Number of pages7
JournalPsychonomic Bulletin and Review
Volume11
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2004 Apr

Fingerprint

Short-Term Memory
Efficiency
Spatial Memory
Visual Search
Working Memory

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

@article{aaa8719f44db464d9a1ea029cf6c82bc,
title = "The role of spatial working memory in visual search efficiency",
abstract = "Many theories have proposed that visual working memory plays an important role in visual search. In contrast, by showing that a nonspatial working memory load did not interfere with search efficiency, Woodman, Vogel, and Luck (2001) recently proposed that the role of working memory in visual search is insignificant. However, the visual search process may interfere with spatial working memory. In the present study, a visual search task was performed concurrently with either a spatial working memory task (Experiment 1) or a nonspatial working memory task (Experiment 2). We found that the visual search process interfered with a spatial working memory load, but not with a nonspatial working memory load. These results suggest that there is a distinction between spatial and nonspatial working memory in terms of interactions with visual search tasks. These results imply that the visual search process and spatial working memory storage require the same limited-capacity mechanisms.",
author = "Oh, {Sei Hwan} and Kim, {Min Shik}",
year = "2004",
month = "4",
doi = "10.3758/BF03196570",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "275--281",
journal = "Psychonomic Bulletin and Review",
issn = "1069-9384",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "2",

}

The role of spatial working memory in visual search efficiency. / Oh, Sei Hwan; Kim, Min Shik.

In: Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, Vol. 11, No. 2, 04.2004, p. 275-281.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of spatial working memory in visual search efficiency

AU - Oh, Sei Hwan

AU - Kim, Min Shik

PY - 2004/4

Y1 - 2004/4

N2 - Many theories have proposed that visual working memory plays an important role in visual search. In contrast, by showing that a nonspatial working memory load did not interfere with search efficiency, Woodman, Vogel, and Luck (2001) recently proposed that the role of working memory in visual search is insignificant. However, the visual search process may interfere with spatial working memory. In the present study, a visual search task was performed concurrently with either a spatial working memory task (Experiment 1) or a nonspatial working memory task (Experiment 2). We found that the visual search process interfered with a spatial working memory load, but not with a nonspatial working memory load. These results suggest that there is a distinction between spatial and nonspatial working memory in terms of interactions with visual search tasks. These results imply that the visual search process and spatial working memory storage require the same limited-capacity mechanisms.

AB - Many theories have proposed that visual working memory plays an important role in visual search. In contrast, by showing that a nonspatial working memory load did not interfere with search efficiency, Woodman, Vogel, and Luck (2001) recently proposed that the role of working memory in visual search is insignificant. However, the visual search process may interfere with spatial working memory. In the present study, a visual search task was performed concurrently with either a spatial working memory task (Experiment 1) or a nonspatial working memory task (Experiment 2). We found that the visual search process interfered with a spatial working memory load, but not with a nonspatial working memory load. These results suggest that there is a distinction between spatial and nonspatial working memory in terms of interactions with visual search tasks. These results imply that the visual search process and spatial working memory storage require the same limited-capacity mechanisms.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4344703897&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4344703897&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3758/BF03196570

DO - 10.3758/BF03196570

M3 - Article

C2 - 15260193

AN - SCOPUS:4344703897

VL - 11

SP - 275

EP - 281

JO - Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

JF - Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

SN - 1069-9384

IS - 2

ER -