The toxicity of graphene oxides: Dependence on the oxidative methods used

Elaine Lay Khim Chng, Martin Pumera

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

103 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Graphene, a class of two-dimensional carbon nanomaterial, has attracted extensive interest in recent years, with a significant amount of research focusing on graphene oxides (GOs). They have been primed as potential candidates for biomedical applications such as cell labeling and drug delivery, thus the toxicity and behavior of graphene oxides in biological systems are fundamental issues that need urgent attention. The production of GO is generally achieved through a top-down route, which includes the usage of concentrated H 2SO4 along with: 1) concentrated nitric acid and KClO 3 oxidant (Hoffmann); 2) fuming nitric acid and KClO3 oxidant (Staudenmaier); 3) concentrated phosphoric acid with KMnO4 (Tour); or 4) sodium nitrate for in-situ production of nitric acid in the presence of KMnO4 (Hummers). It has been widely assumed that the properties of these four GOs produced by using the above different methods are roughly similar, so the methods have been used interchangeably. However, several studies have reported that the toxicity of graphene-related nanomaterials in biological systems may be influenced by their physiochemical properties, such as surface functional groups and structural defects. In addition, considering how GOs are increasingly used in the field of biomedicine, we are interested to see how the oxygen content/functional groups of GOs can impact their toxicological profiles. Since in-vitro testing is a common first step in assessing the health risks related with engineered nanomaterials, the cytotoxicity of the GOs prepared by the four different oxidative treatments was investigated by measuring the mitochondrial activity in adherent lung epithelial cells (A549) by using commercially available viability assays. The dose-response data was generated by using two assays, the methylthiazolyldiphenyl-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay and the water-soluble tetrazolium salt (WST-8). From the viability data, it is evident that there is a strong dose-dependent cytotoxic response resulting from the four GO nanomaterials tested after a 24 h exposure, and it is suggested that there is a correlation between the amounts of oxygen content/functional groups of GOs with their toxicological behavior towards the A549 cells. GO get 'em: The toxicity of graphene is governed by the amount and type of oxygen-containing groups on its surface and is important for practical applications. The influence of differing oxidative treatments (Staudenmaier, Hofmann, Hummers, and Tour) on the toxicological behavior of graphene oxides have been investigated in adherent lung epithelial cells (see figure)

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)8227-8235
Number of pages9
JournalChemistry - A European Journal
Volume19
Issue number25
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013 Jun 17

Fingerprint

Graphite
Oxides
Graphene
Toxicity
Nanostructured materials
Nitric Acid
Nitric acid
Functional groups
Assays
Biological systems
Oxygen
Oxidants
Tetrazolium Salts
Health risks
Phosphoric acid
Cytotoxicity
Bromides
Drug delivery
Labeling
Nitrates

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Catalysis
  • Organic Chemistry

Cite this

@article{f681f6ab92f743d38d358e1f550c0fa0,
title = "The toxicity of graphene oxides: Dependence on the oxidative methods used",
abstract = "Graphene, a class of two-dimensional carbon nanomaterial, has attracted extensive interest in recent years, with a significant amount of research focusing on graphene oxides (GOs). They have been primed as potential candidates for biomedical applications such as cell labeling and drug delivery, thus the toxicity and behavior of graphene oxides in biological systems are fundamental issues that need urgent attention. The production of GO is generally achieved through a top-down route, which includes the usage of concentrated H 2SO4 along with: 1) concentrated nitric acid and KClO 3 oxidant (Hoffmann); 2) fuming nitric acid and KClO3 oxidant (Staudenmaier); 3) concentrated phosphoric acid with KMnO4 (Tour); or 4) sodium nitrate for in-situ production of nitric acid in the presence of KMnO4 (Hummers). It has been widely assumed that the properties of these four GOs produced by using the above different methods are roughly similar, so the methods have been used interchangeably. However, several studies have reported that the toxicity of graphene-related nanomaterials in biological systems may be influenced by their physiochemical properties, such as surface functional groups and structural defects. In addition, considering how GOs are increasingly used in the field of biomedicine, we are interested to see how the oxygen content/functional groups of GOs can impact their toxicological profiles. Since in-vitro testing is a common first step in assessing the health risks related with engineered nanomaterials, the cytotoxicity of the GOs prepared by the four different oxidative treatments was investigated by measuring the mitochondrial activity in adherent lung epithelial cells (A549) by using commercially available viability assays. The dose-response data was generated by using two assays, the methylthiazolyldiphenyl-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay and the water-soluble tetrazolium salt (WST-8). From the viability data, it is evident that there is a strong dose-dependent cytotoxic response resulting from the four GO nanomaterials tested after a 24 h exposure, and it is suggested that there is a correlation between the amounts of oxygen content/functional groups of GOs with their toxicological behavior towards the A549 cells. GO get 'em: The toxicity of graphene is governed by the amount and type of oxygen-containing groups on its surface and is important for practical applications. The influence of differing oxidative treatments (Staudenmaier, Hofmann, Hummers, and Tour) on the toxicological behavior of graphene oxides have been investigated in adherent lung epithelial cells (see figure)",
author = "Chng, {Elaine Lay Khim} and Martin Pumera",
year = "2013",
month = "6",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1002/chem.201300824",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "8227--8235",
journal = "Chemistry - A European Journal",
issn = "0947-6539",
publisher = "Wiley-VCH Verlag",
number = "25",

}

The toxicity of graphene oxides : Dependence on the oxidative methods used. / Chng, Elaine Lay Khim; Pumera, Martin.

In: Chemistry - A European Journal, Vol. 19, No. 25, 17.06.2013, p. 8227-8235.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The toxicity of graphene oxides

T2 - Dependence on the oxidative methods used

AU - Chng, Elaine Lay Khim

AU - Pumera, Martin

PY - 2013/6/17

Y1 - 2013/6/17

N2 - Graphene, a class of two-dimensional carbon nanomaterial, has attracted extensive interest in recent years, with a significant amount of research focusing on graphene oxides (GOs). They have been primed as potential candidates for biomedical applications such as cell labeling and drug delivery, thus the toxicity and behavior of graphene oxides in biological systems are fundamental issues that need urgent attention. The production of GO is generally achieved through a top-down route, which includes the usage of concentrated H 2SO4 along with: 1) concentrated nitric acid and KClO 3 oxidant (Hoffmann); 2) fuming nitric acid and KClO3 oxidant (Staudenmaier); 3) concentrated phosphoric acid with KMnO4 (Tour); or 4) sodium nitrate for in-situ production of nitric acid in the presence of KMnO4 (Hummers). It has been widely assumed that the properties of these four GOs produced by using the above different methods are roughly similar, so the methods have been used interchangeably. However, several studies have reported that the toxicity of graphene-related nanomaterials in biological systems may be influenced by their physiochemical properties, such as surface functional groups and structural defects. In addition, considering how GOs are increasingly used in the field of biomedicine, we are interested to see how the oxygen content/functional groups of GOs can impact their toxicological profiles. Since in-vitro testing is a common first step in assessing the health risks related with engineered nanomaterials, the cytotoxicity of the GOs prepared by the four different oxidative treatments was investigated by measuring the mitochondrial activity in adherent lung epithelial cells (A549) by using commercially available viability assays. The dose-response data was generated by using two assays, the methylthiazolyldiphenyl-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay and the water-soluble tetrazolium salt (WST-8). From the viability data, it is evident that there is a strong dose-dependent cytotoxic response resulting from the four GO nanomaterials tested after a 24 h exposure, and it is suggested that there is a correlation between the amounts of oxygen content/functional groups of GOs with their toxicological behavior towards the A549 cells. GO get 'em: The toxicity of graphene is governed by the amount and type of oxygen-containing groups on its surface and is important for practical applications. The influence of differing oxidative treatments (Staudenmaier, Hofmann, Hummers, and Tour) on the toxicological behavior of graphene oxides have been investigated in adherent lung epithelial cells (see figure)

AB - Graphene, a class of two-dimensional carbon nanomaterial, has attracted extensive interest in recent years, with a significant amount of research focusing on graphene oxides (GOs). They have been primed as potential candidates for biomedical applications such as cell labeling and drug delivery, thus the toxicity and behavior of graphene oxides in biological systems are fundamental issues that need urgent attention. The production of GO is generally achieved through a top-down route, which includes the usage of concentrated H 2SO4 along with: 1) concentrated nitric acid and KClO 3 oxidant (Hoffmann); 2) fuming nitric acid and KClO3 oxidant (Staudenmaier); 3) concentrated phosphoric acid with KMnO4 (Tour); or 4) sodium nitrate for in-situ production of nitric acid in the presence of KMnO4 (Hummers). It has been widely assumed that the properties of these four GOs produced by using the above different methods are roughly similar, so the methods have been used interchangeably. However, several studies have reported that the toxicity of graphene-related nanomaterials in biological systems may be influenced by their physiochemical properties, such as surface functional groups and structural defects. In addition, considering how GOs are increasingly used in the field of biomedicine, we are interested to see how the oxygen content/functional groups of GOs can impact their toxicological profiles. Since in-vitro testing is a common first step in assessing the health risks related with engineered nanomaterials, the cytotoxicity of the GOs prepared by the four different oxidative treatments was investigated by measuring the mitochondrial activity in adherent lung epithelial cells (A549) by using commercially available viability assays. The dose-response data was generated by using two assays, the methylthiazolyldiphenyl-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay and the water-soluble tetrazolium salt (WST-8). From the viability data, it is evident that there is a strong dose-dependent cytotoxic response resulting from the four GO nanomaterials tested after a 24 h exposure, and it is suggested that there is a correlation between the amounts of oxygen content/functional groups of GOs with their toxicological behavior towards the A549 cells. GO get 'em: The toxicity of graphene is governed by the amount and type of oxygen-containing groups on its surface and is important for practical applications. The influence of differing oxidative treatments (Staudenmaier, Hofmann, Hummers, and Tour) on the toxicological behavior of graphene oxides have been investigated in adherent lung epithelial cells (see figure)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878864936&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84878864936&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/chem.201300824

DO - 10.1002/chem.201300824

M3 - Article

C2 - 23630053

AN - SCOPUS:84878864936

VL - 19

SP - 8227

EP - 8235

JO - Chemistry - A European Journal

JF - Chemistry - A European Journal

SN - 0947-6539

IS - 25

ER -