The world vs. Kim jong-il: The legal case against a nuclear-armed north korea

James Strohmaier, Joe Carroll Phillips

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper focuses on the international legal issues surrounding the alleged nuclear-weapon program of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, or North Korea. The DPRK has withdrawn from the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, the first country to do so, and apparently is proceeding with the development of nuclear weapons. The regional Six-Party Talks, discussing North Korea’s nuclear disarmament, have been unproductive. The international community, led by the United States, is verging on more coercive, even punitive, action. Before legally taking those actions, a case probably will be presented to a world forum that North Korea has violated international law. The relevant issues involve the right to withdraw from the NPT, the continued relevance of the 1994 U.S.-DPRK Agreed Framework, legal structures established by the United Nations and United States to control the spread of weapons of mass destruction, and the UN Security Council’s general powers to preserve international peace. The case against North Korea has strengths, but so does North Korea’s legal defense, including allegations that the nuclear non-proliferation regime is inconsistently applied and that the nuclear powers have failed to comply with their disarmament obligations. At issue is not merely the DPRK’s nuclear-weapon program but the continued significance of the current non-proliferation system.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)193-239
Number of pages47
JournalPacific Focus
Volume20
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2005 Jan 1

Fingerprint

North Korea
nuclear weapon
disarmament
regional party
UN Security Council
weapon of mass destruction
nuclear power
international law
treaty
proliferation
Korea
obligation
UNO
peace
regime
community

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

@article{84538825f1394e5991c0ac8333a5d7d4,
title = "The world vs. Kim jong-il: The legal case against a nuclear-armed north korea",
abstract = "This paper focuses on the international legal issues surrounding the alleged nuclear-weapon program of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, or North Korea. The DPRK has withdrawn from the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, the first country to do so, and apparently is proceeding with the development of nuclear weapons. The regional Six-Party Talks, discussing North Korea’s nuclear disarmament, have been unproductive. The international community, led by the United States, is verging on more coercive, even punitive, action. Before legally taking those actions, a case probably will be presented to a world forum that North Korea has violated international law. The relevant issues involve the right to withdraw from the NPT, the continued relevance of the 1994 U.S.-DPRK Agreed Framework, legal structures established by the United Nations and United States to control the spread of weapons of mass destruction, and the UN Security Council’s general powers to preserve international peace. The case against North Korea has strengths, but so does North Korea’s legal defense, including allegations that the nuclear non-proliferation regime is inconsistently applied and that the nuclear powers have failed to comply with their disarmament obligations. At issue is not merely the DPRK’s nuclear-weapon program but the continued significance of the current non-proliferation system.",
author = "James Strohmaier and Phillips, {Joe Carroll}",
year = "2005",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1976-5118.2005.tb00292.x",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "193--239",
journal = "Pacific Focus",
issn = "1225-4657",
publisher = "INHA University",
number = "2",

}

The world vs. Kim jong-il : The legal case against a nuclear-armed north korea. / Strohmaier, James; Phillips, Joe Carroll.

In: Pacific Focus, Vol. 20, No. 2, 01.01.2005, p. 193-239.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The world vs. Kim jong-il

T2 - The legal case against a nuclear-armed north korea

AU - Strohmaier, James

AU - Phillips, Joe Carroll

PY - 2005/1/1

Y1 - 2005/1/1

N2 - This paper focuses on the international legal issues surrounding the alleged nuclear-weapon program of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, or North Korea. The DPRK has withdrawn from the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, the first country to do so, and apparently is proceeding with the development of nuclear weapons. The regional Six-Party Talks, discussing North Korea’s nuclear disarmament, have been unproductive. The international community, led by the United States, is verging on more coercive, even punitive, action. Before legally taking those actions, a case probably will be presented to a world forum that North Korea has violated international law. The relevant issues involve the right to withdraw from the NPT, the continued relevance of the 1994 U.S.-DPRK Agreed Framework, legal structures established by the United Nations and United States to control the spread of weapons of mass destruction, and the UN Security Council’s general powers to preserve international peace. The case against North Korea has strengths, but so does North Korea’s legal defense, including allegations that the nuclear non-proliferation regime is inconsistently applied and that the nuclear powers have failed to comply with their disarmament obligations. At issue is not merely the DPRK’s nuclear-weapon program but the continued significance of the current non-proliferation system.

AB - This paper focuses on the international legal issues surrounding the alleged nuclear-weapon program of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, or North Korea. The DPRK has withdrawn from the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, the first country to do so, and apparently is proceeding with the development of nuclear weapons. The regional Six-Party Talks, discussing North Korea’s nuclear disarmament, have been unproductive. The international community, led by the United States, is verging on more coercive, even punitive, action. Before legally taking those actions, a case probably will be presented to a world forum that North Korea has violated international law. The relevant issues involve the right to withdraw from the NPT, the continued relevance of the 1994 U.S.-DPRK Agreed Framework, legal structures established by the United Nations and United States to control the spread of weapons of mass destruction, and the UN Security Council’s general powers to preserve international peace. The case against North Korea has strengths, but so does North Korea’s legal defense, including allegations that the nuclear non-proliferation regime is inconsistently applied and that the nuclear powers have failed to comply with their disarmament obligations. At issue is not merely the DPRK’s nuclear-weapon program but the continued significance of the current non-proliferation system.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040404125&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85040404125&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1976-5118.2005.tb00292.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1976-5118.2005.tb00292.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85040404125

VL - 20

SP - 193

EP - 239

JO - Pacific Focus

JF - Pacific Focus

SN - 1225-4657

IS - 2

ER -