Therapeutic robot-assisted neck dissection via a retroauricular or modified facelift approach in head and neck cancer: A comparative study with conventional transcervical neck dissection

Won Shik Kim, Hyung Kwon Byeon, Young Min Park, Jong Gyun Ha, Eun Sung Kim, Yoonwoo Koh, Eun Chang Choi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. In a previous study of robot-assisted neck dissection (RAND), we limited the indication for neck dissection in clinical N0 head and neck cancer. The purpose of this study was for us to present the comparison of the results of therapeutic RAND via a retroauricu-lar or modified facelift approach with outcomes from conventional neck dissection in clinical node-positive head and neck cancer. Methods. This study involved a total of 53 patients who underwent neck dissection for head and neck cancer. Operative and pathologic parameters were assessed. Results. The RAND and the conventional neck dissection group consisted of 20 and 33 patients, respectively. The mean operative time for the RAND group was significantly longer than that of the conventional neck dissection group. The mean number of retrieved lymph nodes in the RAND group was not significantly different from the conventional neck dissection group. Conclusion. Therapeutic RAND via a retroauricular or modified facelift approach was successful with satisfactory esthetic results in patients with node-positive head and neck cancer.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)249-254
Number of pages6
JournalHead and Neck
Volume37
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Feb 1

Fingerprint

Rhytidoplasty
Neck Dissection
Head and Neck Neoplasms
Therapeutics
Operative Time
Esthetics

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Kim, Won Shik ; Byeon, Hyung Kwon ; Park, Young Min ; Ha, Jong Gyun ; Kim, Eun Sung ; Koh, Yoonwoo ; Choi, Eun Chang. / Therapeutic robot-assisted neck dissection via a retroauricular or modified facelift approach in head and neck cancer : A comparative study with conventional transcervical neck dissection. In: Head and Neck. 2015 ; Vol. 37, No. 2. pp. 249-254.
@article{96750da5129845a8a558e98b93abc840,
title = "Therapeutic robot-assisted neck dissection via a retroauricular or modified facelift approach in head and neck cancer: A comparative study with conventional transcervical neck dissection",
abstract = "Background. In a previous study of robot-assisted neck dissection (RAND), we limited the indication for neck dissection in clinical N0 head and neck cancer. The purpose of this study was for us to present the comparison of the results of therapeutic RAND via a retroauricu-lar or modified facelift approach with outcomes from conventional neck dissection in clinical node-positive head and neck cancer. Methods. This study involved a total of 53 patients who underwent neck dissection for head and neck cancer. Operative and pathologic parameters were assessed. Results. The RAND and the conventional neck dissection group consisted of 20 and 33 patients, respectively. The mean operative time for the RAND group was significantly longer than that of the conventional neck dissection group. The mean number of retrieved lymph nodes in the RAND group was not significantly different from the conventional neck dissection group. Conclusion. Therapeutic RAND via a retroauricular or modified facelift approach was successful with satisfactory esthetic results in patients with node-positive head and neck cancer.",
author = "Kim, {Won Shik} and Byeon, {Hyung Kwon} and Park, {Young Min} and Ha, {Jong Gyun} and Kim, {Eun Sung} and Yoonwoo Koh and Choi, {Eun Chang}",
year = "2015",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/hed.23595",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "249--254",
journal = "Head and Neck",
issn = "1043-3074",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "2",

}

Therapeutic robot-assisted neck dissection via a retroauricular or modified facelift approach in head and neck cancer : A comparative study with conventional transcervical neck dissection. / Kim, Won Shik; Byeon, Hyung Kwon; Park, Young Min; Ha, Jong Gyun; Kim, Eun Sung; Koh, Yoonwoo; Choi, Eun Chang.

In: Head and Neck, Vol. 37, No. 2, 01.02.2015, p. 249-254.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Therapeutic robot-assisted neck dissection via a retroauricular or modified facelift approach in head and neck cancer

T2 - A comparative study with conventional transcervical neck dissection

AU - Kim, Won Shik

AU - Byeon, Hyung Kwon

AU - Park, Young Min

AU - Ha, Jong Gyun

AU - Kim, Eun Sung

AU - Koh, Yoonwoo

AU - Choi, Eun Chang

PY - 2015/2/1

Y1 - 2015/2/1

N2 - Background. In a previous study of robot-assisted neck dissection (RAND), we limited the indication for neck dissection in clinical N0 head and neck cancer. The purpose of this study was for us to present the comparison of the results of therapeutic RAND via a retroauricu-lar or modified facelift approach with outcomes from conventional neck dissection in clinical node-positive head and neck cancer. Methods. This study involved a total of 53 patients who underwent neck dissection for head and neck cancer. Operative and pathologic parameters were assessed. Results. The RAND and the conventional neck dissection group consisted of 20 and 33 patients, respectively. The mean operative time for the RAND group was significantly longer than that of the conventional neck dissection group. The mean number of retrieved lymph nodes in the RAND group was not significantly different from the conventional neck dissection group. Conclusion. Therapeutic RAND via a retroauricular or modified facelift approach was successful with satisfactory esthetic results in patients with node-positive head and neck cancer.

AB - Background. In a previous study of robot-assisted neck dissection (RAND), we limited the indication for neck dissection in clinical N0 head and neck cancer. The purpose of this study was for us to present the comparison of the results of therapeutic RAND via a retroauricu-lar or modified facelift approach with outcomes from conventional neck dissection in clinical node-positive head and neck cancer. Methods. This study involved a total of 53 patients who underwent neck dissection for head and neck cancer. Operative and pathologic parameters were assessed. Results. The RAND and the conventional neck dissection group consisted of 20 and 33 patients, respectively. The mean operative time for the RAND group was significantly longer than that of the conventional neck dissection group. The mean number of retrieved lymph nodes in the RAND group was not significantly different from the conventional neck dissection group. Conclusion. Therapeutic RAND via a retroauricular or modified facelift approach was successful with satisfactory esthetic results in patients with node-positive head and neck cancer.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84921438549&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84921438549&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/hed.23595

DO - 10.1002/hed.23595

M3 - Article

C2 - 24375942

AN - SCOPUS:84921438549

VL - 37

SP - 249

EP - 254

JO - Head and Neck

JF - Head and Neck

SN - 1043-3074

IS - 2

ER -