Tight and loose are not created equal: An asymmetry underlying the representation of fit in English- and Korean-speakers

Heather M. Norbury, Sandra R. Waxman, Hyun Joo Song

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Research concerning the spatial dimension fit (tight versus loose) has been based on a tacit but untested assumption that the dimension fit is symmetrical, with tight- and loose-fitting relations highlighting the dimension fit with equal force. We propose a reformulation, documenting that adult speakers of English (Experiment 1) and Korean (Experiment 2) are sensitive to the dimension fit, but that their representation is asymmetric, with tight-fitting events highlighting fit with greater force than loose-fitting events. We propose that sensitivity to the dimension fit is more resilient than has previously been suggested, and that the asymmetry documented here provides a foundation upon which to pursue nuanced questions about the relationship between language and our underlying representations of space.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)316-325
Number of pages10
JournalCognition
Volume109
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008 Dec 1

Fingerprint

asymmetry
Language
event
experiment
Research
language
Asymmetry
Experiment

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Cite this

@article{aa7693fba5bf42aaa2777b7391142d37,
title = "Tight and loose are not created equal: An asymmetry underlying the representation of fit in English- and Korean-speakers",
abstract = "Research concerning the spatial dimension fit (tight versus loose) has been based on a tacit but untested assumption that the dimension fit is symmetrical, with tight- and loose-fitting relations highlighting the dimension fit with equal force. We propose a reformulation, documenting that adult speakers of English (Experiment 1) and Korean (Experiment 2) are sensitive to the dimension fit, but that their representation is asymmetric, with tight-fitting events highlighting fit with greater force than loose-fitting events. We propose that sensitivity to the dimension fit is more resilient than has previously been suggested, and that the asymmetry documented here provides a foundation upon which to pursue nuanced questions about the relationship between language and our underlying representations of space.",
author = "Norbury, {Heather M.} and Waxman, {Sandra R.} and Song, {Hyun Joo}",
year = "2008",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.cognition.2008.07.019",
language = "English",
volume = "109",
pages = "316--325",
journal = "Cognition",
issn = "0010-0277",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

Tight and loose are not created equal : An asymmetry underlying the representation of fit in English- and Korean-speakers. / Norbury, Heather M.; Waxman, Sandra R.; Song, Hyun Joo.

In: Cognition, Vol. 109, No. 3, 01.12.2008, p. 316-325.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Tight and loose are not created equal

T2 - An asymmetry underlying the representation of fit in English- and Korean-speakers

AU - Norbury, Heather M.

AU - Waxman, Sandra R.

AU - Song, Hyun Joo

PY - 2008/12/1

Y1 - 2008/12/1

N2 - Research concerning the spatial dimension fit (tight versus loose) has been based on a tacit but untested assumption that the dimension fit is symmetrical, with tight- and loose-fitting relations highlighting the dimension fit with equal force. We propose a reformulation, documenting that adult speakers of English (Experiment 1) and Korean (Experiment 2) are sensitive to the dimension fit, but that their representation is asymmetric, with tight-fitting events highlighting fit with greater force than loose-fitting events. We propose that sensitivity to the dimension fit is more resilient than has previously been suggested, and that the asymmetry documented here provides a foundation upon which to pursue nuanced questions about the relationship between language and our underlying representations of space.

AB - Research concerning the spatial dimension fit (tight versus loose) has been based on a tacit but untested assumption that the dimension fit is symmetrical, with tight- and loose-fitting relations highlighting the dimension fit with equal force. We propose a reformulation, documenting that adult speakers of English (Experiment 1) and Korean (Experiment 2) are sensitive to the dimension fit, but that their representation is asymmetric, with tight-fitting events highlighting fit with greater force than loose-fitting events. We propose that sensitivity to the dimension fit is more resilient than has previously been suggested, and that the asymmetry documented here provides a foundation upon which to pursue nuanced questions about the relationship between language and our underlying representations of space.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=56349151958&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=56349151958&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.07.019

DO - 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.07.019

M3 - Article

C2 - 19010464

AN - SCOPUS:56349151958

VL - 109

SP - 316

EP - 325

JO - Cognition

JF - Cognition

SN - 0010-0277

IS - 3

ER -