Total ankle arthroplasty versus ankle arthrodesis for the treatment of end-stage ankle arthritis

a meta-analysis of comparative studies

Hyun Jung Kim, Dong Hun Suh, Jae Hyuk Yang, jinwoo lee, Hak Jun Kim, Hyeong Sik Ahn, Seung Woo Han, Gi Won Choi

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) and ankle arthrodesis (AA) are the main surgical treatment options for end-stage ankle arthritis. Although the superiority of each modality remains debated, there remains a lack of high-quality evidence-based studies, such as randomized controlled clinical trials, and meta-analyses of comparative studies. We performed a meta-analysis of comparative studies to determine whether there is a significant difference between these two procedures in terms of (i) clinical scores and patient satisfaction, (ii) re-operations, and (iii) complications. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane library databases. Only retrospective or prospective comparative studies were included in this meta-analysis. The literature search, data extraction, and quality assessment were conducted by two independent reviewers. The primary outcomes were clinical scores and patient satisfaction. We also investigated the prevalence of complications and the re-operation rate. Results: Ten comparative studies were included (four prospective and six retrospective studies). There were no significant differences between the two procedures in the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle–hindfoot score, Short Form-36 physical component summary and mental component summary scores, visual analogue scale for pain, and patient satisfaction rate. The risk of re-operation and major surgical complications were significantly increased in the TAA group. Conclusions: The meta-analysis revealed that TAA and AA could achieve similar clinical outcomes, whereas the incidence of re-operation and major surgical complication was significantly increased in TAA. Further studies of high methodological quality with long-term follow-up are required to confirm our conclusions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)101-109
Number of pages9
JournalInternational Orthopaedics
Volume41
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Arthrodesis
Ankle
Arthroplasty
Arthritis
Meta-Analysis
Patient Satisfaction
Therapeutics
Pain Measurement
MEDLINE
Libraries
Orthopedics
Foot
Randomized Controlled Trials
Retrospective Studies
Databases
Prospective Studies
Incidence

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Kim, Hyun Jung ; Suh, Dong Hun ; Yang, Jae Hyuk ; lee, jinwoo ; Kim, Hak Jun ; Ahn, Hyeong Sik ; Han, Seung Woo ; Choi, Gi Won. / Total ankle arthroplasty versus ankle arthrodesis for the treatment of end-stage ankle arthritis : a meta-analysis of comparative studies. In: International Orthopaedics. 2017 ; Vol. 41, No. 1. pp. 101-109.
@article{cc3259286d534f3a8531da1fdc25957e,
title = "Total ankle arthroplasty versus ankle arthrodesis for the treatment of end-stage ankle arthritis: a meta-analysis of comparative studies",
abstract = "Purpose: Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) and ankle arthrodesis (AA) are the main surgical treatment options for end-stage ankle arthritis. Although the superiority of each modality remains debated, there remains a lack of high-quality evidence-based studies, such as randomized controlled clinical trials, and meta-analyses of comparative studies. We performed a meta-analysis of comparative studies to determine whether there is a significant difference between these two procedures in terms of (i) clinical scores and patient satisfaction, (ii) re-operations, and (iii) complications. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane library databases. Only retrospective or prospective comparative studies were included in this meta-analysis. The literature search, data extraction, and quality assessment were conducted by two independent reviewers. The primary outcomes were clinical scores and patient satisfaction. We also investigated the prevalence of complications and the re-operation rate. Results: Ten comparative studies were included (four prospective and six retrospective studies). There were no significant differences between the two procedures in the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle–hindfoot score, Short Form-36 physical component summary and mental component summary scores, visual analogue scale for pain, and patient satisfaction rate. The risk of re-operation and major surgical complications were significantly increased in the TAA group. Conclusions: The meta-analysis revealed that TAA and AA could achieve similar clinical outcomes, whereas the incidence of re-operation and major surgical complication was significantly increased in TAA. Further studies of high methodological quality with long-term follow-up are required to confirm our conclusions.",
author = "Kim, {Hyun Jung} and Suh, {Dong Hun} and Yang, {Jae Hyuk} and jinwoo lee and Kim, {Hak Jun} and Ahn, {Hyeong Sik} and Han, {Seung Woo} and Choi, {Gi Won}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00264-016-3303-3",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "101--109",
journal = "International Orthopaedics",
issn = "0341-2695",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "1",

}

Total ankle arthroplasty versus ankle arthrodesis for the treatment of end-stage ankle arthritis : a meta-analysis of comparative studies. / Kim, Hyun Jung; Suh, Dong Hun; Yang, Jae Hyuk; lee, jinwoo; Kim, Hak Jun; Ahn, Hyeong Sik; Han, Seung Woo; Choi, Gi Won.

In: International Orthopaedics, Vol. 41, No. 1, 01.01.2017, p. 101-109.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Total ankle arthroplasty versus ankle arthrodesis for the treatment of end-stage ankle arthritis

T2 - a meta-analysis of comparative studies

AU - Kim, Hyun Jung

AU - Suh, Dong Hun

AU - Yang, Jae Hyuk

AU - lee, jinwoo

AU - Kim, Hak Jun

AU - Ahn, Hyeong Sik

AU - Han, Seung Woo

AU - Choi, Gi Won

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Purpose: Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) and ankle arthrodesis (AA) are the main surgical treatment options for end-stage ankle arthritis. Although the superiority of each modality remains debated, there remains a lack of high-quality evidence-based studies, such as randomized controlled clinical trials, and meta-analyses of comparative studies. We performed a meta-analysis of comparative studies to determine whether there is a significant difference between these two procedures in terms of (i) clinical scores and patient satisfaction, (ii) re-operations, and (iii) complications. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane library databases. Only retrospective or prospective comparative studies were included in this meta-analysis. The literature search, data extraction, and quality assessment were conducted by two independent reviewers. The primary outcomes were clinical scores and patient satisfaction. We also investigated the prevalence of complications and the re-operation rate. Results: Ten comparative studies were included (four prospective and six retrospective studies). There were no significant differences between the two procedures in the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle–hindfoot score, Short Form-36 physical component summary and mental component summary scores, visual analogue scale for pain, and patient satisfaction rate. The risk of re-operation and major surgical complications were significantly increased in the TAA group. Conclusions: The meta-analysis revealed that TAA and AA could achieve similar clinical outcomes, whereas the incidence of re-operation and major surgical complication was significantly increased in TAA. Further studies of high methodological quality with long-term follow-up are required to confirm our conclusions.

AB - Purpose: Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) and ankle arthrodesis (AA) are the main surgical treatment options for end-stage ankle arthritis. Although the superiority of each modality remains debated, there remains a lack of high-quality evidence-based studies, such as randomized controlled clinical trials, and meta-analyses of comparative studies. We performed a meta-analysis of comparative studies to determine whether there is a significant difference between these two procedures in terms of (i) clinical scores and patient satisfaction, (ii) re-operations, and (iii) complications. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane library databases. Only retrospective or prospective comparative studies were included in this meta-analysis. The literature search, data extraction, and quality assessment were conducted by two independent reviewers. The primary outcomes were clinical scores and patient satisfaction. We also investigated the prevalence of complications and the re-operation rate. Results: Ten comparative studies were included (four prospective and six retrospective studies). There were no significant differences between the two procedures in the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle–hindfoot score, Short Form-36 physical component summary and mental component summary scores, visual analogue scale for pain, and patient satisfaction rate. The risk of re-operation and major surgical complications were significantly increased in the TAA group. Conclusions: The meta-analysis revealed that TAA and AA could achieve similar clinical outcomes, whereas the incidence of re-operation and major surgical complication was significantly increased in TAA. Further studies of high methodological quality with long-term follow-up are required to confirm our conclusions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84990946973&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84990946973&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00264-016-3303-3

DO - 10.1007/s00264-016-3303-3

M3 - Review article

VL - 41

SP - 101

EP - 109

JO - International Orthopaedics

JF - International Orthopaedics

SN - 0341-2695

IS - 1

ER -