Transitions in education policy and interventions for underachievers in South Korea

Pearl Jinjoo Chung, Won Pyo Hong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

South Korea has recently shifted away from an outcomes-based accountability system to a more holistic approach to interventions for underachieving students in elementary school, called Do-Dream schools. Based on qualitative interview data, this study examines how the new intervention policy is perceived and implemented in practice. Findings reveal that teachers and students have positive responses to Do-Dream schools, even though there are some hurdles that hinder the effective implementation of the new policy. Nonetheless, schools attempted to provide more diverse intervention programs to enhance underachieving students’ emotional and academic development instead of focusing on standardized achievement goals. Based on these findings, the study provides wider implications that can be useful in other countries with regard to interventions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)151-171
Number of pages21
JournalKEDI Journal of Educational Policy
Volume12
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Jan 1

Fingerprint

South Korea
education
school
student
holistic approach
qualitative interview
elementary school
responsibility
teacher

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education

Cite this

@article{b1b6ad43044f434cbc07bcb0078ddce2,
title = "Transitions in education policy and interventions for underachievers in South Korea",
abstract = "South Korea has recently shifted away from an outcomes-based accountability system to a more holistic approach to interventions for underachieving students in elementary school, called Do-Dream schools. Based on qualitative interview data, this study examines how the new intervention policy is perceived and implemented in practice. Findings reveal that teachers and students have positive responses to Do-Dream schools, even though there are some hurdles that hinder the effective implementation of the new policy. Nonetheless, schools attempted to provide more diverse intervention programs to enhance underachieving students’ emotional and academic development instead of focusing on standardized achievement goals. Based on these findings, the study provides wider implications that can be useful in other countries with regard to interventions.",
author = "Chung, {Pearl Jinjoo} and Hong, {Won Pyo}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "151--171",
journal = "KEDI Journal of Educational Policy",
issn = "1739-4341",
publisher = "Korean Educational Development Institute (KEDI)",
number = "2",

}

Transitions in education policy and interventions for underachievers in South Korea. / Chung, Pearl Jinjoo; Hong, Won Pyo.

In: KEDI Journal of Educational Policy, Vol. 12, No. 2, 01.01.2015, p. 151-171.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Transitions in education policy and interventions for underachievers in South Korea

AU - Chung, Pearl Jinjoo

AU - Hong, Won Pyo

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - South Korea has recently shifted away from an outcomes-based accountability system to a more holistic approach to interventions for underachieving students in elementary school, called Do-Dream schools. Based on qualitative interview data, this study examines how the new intervention policy is perceived and implemented in practice. Findings reveal that teachers and students have positive responses to Do-Dream schools, even though there are some hurdles that hinder the effective implementation of the new policy. Nonetheless, schools attempted to provide more diverse intervention programs to enhance underachieving students’ emotional and academic development instead of focusing on standardized achievement goals. Based on these findings, the study provides wider implications that can be useful in other countries with regard to interventions.

AB - South Korea has recently shifted away from an outcomes-based accountability system to a more holistic approach to interventions for underachieving students in elementary school, called Do-Dream schools. Based on qualitative interview data, this study examines how the new intervention policy is perceived and implemented in practice. Findings reveal that teachers and students have positive responses to Do-Dream schools, even though there are some hurdles that hinder the effective implementation of the new policy. Nonetheless, schools attempted to provide more diverse intervention programs to enhance underachieving students’ emotional and academic development instead of focusing on standardized achievement goals. Based on these findings, the study provides wider implications that can be useful in other countries with regard to interventions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84953287403&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84953287403&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84953287403

VL - 12

SP - 151

EP - 171

JO - KEDI Journal of Educational Policy

JF - KEDI Journal of Educational Policy

SN - 1739-4341

IS - 2

ER -