Treatment concepts for the posterior maxilla and mandible: Short implants versus long implants in augmented bone

Daniel Stefan Thoma, Jae Kook Cha, Ui Won Jung

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of this narrative review is to describe treatment options for the posterior regions of the mandible and the maxilla, comparing short implants vs. longer implants in an augmented bone. The dental literature was screened for treatment options enabling the placement of dental implants in posterior sites with a reduced vertical bone height in the maxilla and the mandible. Short dental implants have been increasingly used recently, providing a number of advantages including reduced patient morbidity, shorter treatment time, and lower costs. In the posterior maxilla, sinus elevation procedures were for long considered to be the gold standard using various bone substitute materials and rendering high implant survival rates. More recently, implants were even placed without any further use of bone substitute materials, but the long-term outcomes have yet to be documented. Vertical bone augmentation procedures in the mandible require a relatively high level of surgical skill and allow the placement of standard-length dental implants by the use of autogenous bone blocks. Both treatment options, short dental implants, and standard-length implants in combination with vertical bone augmentation procedures, appear to result in predictable outcomes in terms of implant survival rates. According to recent clinical studies comparing the therapeutic options of short implants vs. long implants in augmented bone, the use of short dental implants leads to a number of advantages for the patients and the clinician.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2-12
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Periodontal and Implant Science
Volume47
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Maxilla
Mandible
Dental Implants
Bone and Bones
Bone Substitutes
Therapeutics
Survival Rate
Tooth
Morbidity
Costs and Cost Analysis

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Oral Surgery
  • Periodontics

Cite this

@article{73ca1a1b334d4aa2a811270a0bc5cf6a,
title = "Treatment concepts for the posterior maxilla and mandible: Short implants versus long implants in augmented bone",
abstract = "The aim of this narrative review is to describe treatment options for the posterior regions of the mandible and the maxilla, comparing short implants vs. longer implants in an augmented bone. The dental literature was screened for treatment options enabling the placement of dental implants in posterior sites with a reduced vertical bone height in the maxilla and the mandible. Short dental implants have been increasingly used recently, providing a number of advantages including reduced patient morbidity, shorter treatment time, and lower costs. In the posterior maxilla, sinus elevation procedures were for long considered to be the gold standard using various bone substitute materials and rendering high implant survival rates. More recently, implants were even placed without any further use of bone substitute materials, but the long-term outcomes have yet to be documented. Vertical bone augmentation procedures in the mandible require a relatively high level of surgical skill and allow the placement of standard-length dental implants by the use of autogenous bone blocks. Both treatment options, short dental implants, and standard-length implants in combination with vertical bone augmentation procedures, appear to result in predictable outcomes in terms of implant survival rates. According to recent clinical studies comparing the therapeutic options of short implants vs. long implants in augmented bone, the use of short dental implants leads to a number of advantages for the patients and the clinician.",
author = "Thoma, {Daniel Stefan} and Cha, {Jae Kook} and Jung, {Ui Won}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5051/jpis.2017.47.1.2",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "2--12",
journal = "Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science",
issn = "2093-2278",
publisher = "Korean Academy of Periodontology",
number = "1",

}

Treatment concepts for the posterior maxilla and mandible : Short implants versus long implants in augmented bone. / Thoma, Daniel Stefan; Cha, Jae Kook; Jung, Ui Won.

In: Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science, Vol. 47, No. 1, 01.01.2017, p. 2-12.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Treatment concepts for the posterior maxilla and mandible

T2 - Short implants versus long implants in augmented bone

AU - Thoma, Daniel Stefan

AU - Cha, Jae Kook

AU - Jung, Ui Won

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - The aim of this narrative review is to describe treatment options for the posterior regions of the mandible and the maxilla, comparing short implants vs. longer implants in an augmented bone. The dental literature was screened for treatment options enabling the placement of dental implants in posterior sites with a reduced vertical bone height in the maxilla and the mandible. Short dental implants have been increasingly used recently, providing a number of advantages including reduced patient morbidity, shorter treatment time, and lower costs. In the posterior maxilla, sinus elevation procedures were for long considered to be the gold standard using various bone substitute materials and rendering high implant survival rates. More recently, implants were even placed without any further use of bone substitute materials, but the long-term outcomes have yet to be documented. Vertical bone augmentation procedures in the mandible require a relatively high level of surgical skill and allow the placement of standard-length dental implants by the use of autogenous bone blocks. Both treatment options, short dental implants, and standard-length implants in combination with vertical bone augmentation procedures, appear to result in predictable outcomes in terms of implant survival rates. According to recent clinical studies comparing the therapeutic options of short implants vs. long implants in augmented bone, the use of short dental implants leads to a number of advantages for the patients and the clinician.

AB - The aim of this narrative review is to describe treatment options for the posterior regions of the mandible and the maxilla, comparing short implants vs. longer implants in an augmented bone. The dental literature was screened for treatment options enabling the placement of dental implants in posterior sites with a reduced vertical bone height in the maxilla and the mandible. Short dental implants have been increasingly used recently, providing a number of advantages including reduced patient morbidity, shorter treatment time, and lower costs. In the posterior maxilla, sinus elevation procedures were for long considered to be the gold standard using various bone substitute materials and rendering high implant survival rates. More recently, implants were even placed without any further use of bone substitute materials, but the long-term outcomes have yet to be documented. Vertical bone augmentation procedures in the mandible require a relatively high level of surgical skill and allow the placement of standard-length dental implants by the use of autogenous bone blocks. Both treatment options, short dental implants, and standard-length implants in combination with vertical bone augmentation procedures, appear to result in predictable outcomes in terms of implant survival rates. According to recent clinical studies comparing the therapeutic options of short implants vs. long implants in augmented bone, the use of short dental implants leads to a number of advantages for the patients and the clinician.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014187848&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85014187848&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5051/jpis.2017.47.1.2

DO - 10.5051/jpis.2017.47.1.2

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85014187848

VL - 47

SP - 2

EP - 12

JO - Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science

JF - Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science

SN - 2093-2278

IS - 1

ER -