Abstract
In treating women with leiomyoma and who wish to preserve their uterus, laparoscopic uterine artery ligation or uterine artery embolization should be considered as possible options. This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of laparoscopic uterine artery ligation and uterine artery embolization in treating uterine myoma. The treatment outcomes of 23 patients who underwent uterine artery embolization and 17 laparoscopic uterine artery ligation were evaluated. The uterine volume reduced 3 months after uterine artery embolization, but thereafter no significant changes were observed. On the other hand, the uterine volumes were only slightly reduced 3 months after laparoscopic uterine artery ligation, and slightly more reduced 6 months later. The average reduction in the case of laparoscopic uterine artery ligation was about 58.5%. After laparoscopic uterine artery ligation, 20% of the patients complained of vaginal spotting. Furthermore, the mechanism of volume reduction was evaluated using specimens obtained from a biopsy taken after each procedure. The results suggested that laparoscopic uterine artery ligation results mainly in physiologic cell death, that is apoptosis, whereas, the corresponding result is cell necrosis for uterine artery embolization. Uterine artery embolization and laparoscopic uterine artery ligation are both effective in relieving the symptoms caused by uterine myoma, and therefore both procedures can be used in place of hysterectomy or myomectomy.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 694-702 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Yonsei medical journal |
| Volume | 44 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2003 Aug 30 |
Fingerprint
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Medicine(all)
Cite this
}
Treatment outcomes of uterine artery embolization and laparoscopic uterine artery ligation for uterine myoma. / Park, Ki Hyun; Kim, Jeong Yeon; Shin, Jong Seung; Kwon, Ja Young; Koo, Ja Seong; Jeong, Kyung Ah; Cho, Nam Hoon; Bai, Sang Wook; Lee, Byung Seok.
In: Yonsei medical journal, Vol. 44, No. 4, 30.08.2003, p. 694-702.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
TY - JOUR
T1 - Treatment outcomes of uterine artery embolization and laparoscopic uterine artery ligation for uterine myoma
AU - Park, Ki Hyun
AU - Kim, Jeong Yeon
AU - Shin, Jong Seung
AU - Kwon, Ja Young
AU - Koo, Ja Seong
AU - Jeong, Kyung Ah
AU - Cho, Nam Hoon
AU - Bai, Sang Wook
AU - Lee, Byung Seok
PY - 2003/8/30
Y1 - 2003/8/30
N2 - In treating women with leiomyoma and who wish to preserve their uterus, laparoscopic uterine artery ligation or uterine artery embolization should be considered as possible options. This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of laparoscopic uterine artery ligation and uterine artery embolization in treating uterine myoma. The treatment outcomes of 23 patients who underwent uterine artery embolization and 17 laparoscopic uterine artery ligation were evaluated. The uterine volume reduced 3 months after uterine artery embolization, but thereafter no significant changes were observed. On the other hand, the uterine volumes were only slightly reduced 3 months after laparoscopic uterine artery ligation, and slightly more reduced 6 months later. The average reduction in the case of laparoscopic uterine artery ligation was about 58.5%. After laparoscopic uterine artery ligation, 20% of the patients complained of vaginal spotting. Furthermore, the mechanism of volume reduction was evaluated using specimens obtained from a biopsy taken after each procedure. The results suggested that laparoscopic uterine artery ligation results mainly in physiologic cell death, that is apoptosis, whereas, the corresponding result is cell necrosis for uterine artery embolization. Uterine artery embolization and laparoscopic uterine artery ligation are both effective in relieving the symptoms caused by uterine myoma, and therefore both procedures can be used in place of hysterectomy or myomectomy.
AB - In treating women with leiomyoma and who wish to preserve their uterus, laparoscopic uterine artery ligation or uterine artery embolization should be considered as possible options. This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of laparoscopic uterine artery ligation and uterine artery embolization in treating uterine myoma. The treatment outcomes of 23 patients who underwent uterine artery embolization and 17 laparoscopic uterine artery ligation were evaluated. The uterine volume reduced 3 months after uterine artery embolization, but thereafter no significant changes were observed. On the other hand, the uterine volumes were only slightly reduced 3 months after laparoscopic uterine artery ligation, and slightly more reduced 6 months later. The average reduction in the case of laparoscopic uterine artery ligation was about 58.5%. After laparoscopic uterine artery ligation, 20% of the patients complained of vaginal spotting. Furthermore, the mechanism of volume reduction was evaluated using specimens obtained from a biopsy taken after each procedure. The results suggested that laparoscopic uterine artery ligation results mainly in physiologic cell death, that is apoptosis, whereas, the corresponding result is cell necrosis for uterine artery embolization. Uterine artery embolization and laparoscopic uterine artery ligation are both effective in relieving the symptoms caused by uterine myoma, and therefore both procedures can be used in place of hysterectomy or myomectomy.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0041379111&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0041379111&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3349/ymj.2003.44.4.694
DO - 10.3349/ymj.2003.44.4.694
M3 - Article
C2 - 12950127
AN - SCOPUS:0041379111
VL - 44
SP - 694
EP - 702
JO - Yonsei Medical Journal
JF - Yonsei Medical Journal
SN - 0513-5796
IS - 4
ER -