Treatment-planning CT scan for breast and chest-wall irradiation

how many unexpected abnormalities could we detect?

minjung Kim, Eunkyung Kim, Ki Chang Keum, Byeongwoo Park, Eun Ju Son, Ki Keun Oh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to determine whether diagnostic interpretation of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) images for radiation planning in breast irradiation detects a considerable number of unexpected abnormalities. Materials and methods: One hundred thirty-one patients underwent treatment-planning CT scans for breast or chest-wall irradiation. A diagnostic radiologist prospectively reviewed each scan and determined the incidence of previously unknown findings, the impacts of such findings on treatment, and the need for additional radiological studies based on the CT interpretation. Results: Eighty-six scans were prospectively classified as negative findings, 27 scans were classified as incidental benign findings, 26 scans were classified as medically important findings of which only one case was metastatic. Conclusion: The incidence of clinically important coexistent diseases in CT scans for radiation planning in breast irradiation is very low, although the CT scans were performed with intravenous contrast administration insofar as the preoperative evaluation was appropriate.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)443-446
Number of pages4
JournalClinical Imaging
Volume32
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008 Nov 1

Fingerprint

Thoracic Wall
Breast
Tomography
Radiation
Therapeutics
Incidental Findings
Incidence
Intravenous Administration

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

@article{4393a12c9a8e4edca6a18a405c4344b3,
title = "Treatment-planning CT scan for breast and chest-wall irradiation: how many unexpected abnormalities could we detect?",
abstract = "Objective: The objective of this study was to determine whether diagnostic interpretation of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) images for radiation planning in breast irradiation detects a considerable number of unexpected abnormalities. Materials and methods: One hundred thirty-one patients underwent treatment-planning CT scans for breast or chest-wall irradiation. A diagnostic radiologist prospectively reviewed each scan and determined the incidence of previously unknown findings, the impacts of such findings on treatment, and the need for additional radiological studies based on the CT interpretation. Results: Eighty-six scans were prospectively classified as negative findings, 27 scans were classified as incidental benign findings, 26 scans were classified as medically important findings of which only one case was metastatic. Conclusion: The incidence of clinically important coexistent diseases in CT scans for radiation planning in breast irradiation is very low, although the CT scans were performed with intravenous contrast administration insofar as the preoperative evaluation was appropriate.",
author = "minjung Kim and Eunkyung Kim and Keum, {Ki Chang} and Byeongwoo Park and Son, {Eun Ju} and Oh, {Ki Keun}",
year = "2008",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.clinimag.2008.02.025",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "443--446",
journal = "Clinical Imaging",
issn = "0899-7071",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "6",

}

Treatment-planning CT scan for breast and chest-wall irradiation : how many unexpected abnormalities could we detect? / Kim, minjung; Kim, Eunkyung; Keum, Ki Chang; Park, Byeongwoo; Son, Eun Ju; Oh, Ki Keun.

In: Clinical Imaging, Vol. 32, No. 6, 01.11.2008, p. 443-446.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Treatment-planning CT scan for breast and chest-wall irradiation

T2 - how many unexpected abnormalities could we detect?

AU - Kim, minjung

AU - Kim, Eunkyung

AU - Keum, Ki Chang

AU - Park, Byeongwoo

AU - Son, Eun Ju

AU - Oh, Ki Keun

PY - 2008/11/1

Y1 - 2008/11/1

N2 - Objective: The objective of this study was to determine whether diagnostic interpretation of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) images for radiation planning in breast irradiation detects a considerable number of unexpected abnormalities. Materials and methods: One hundred thirty-one patients underwent treatment-planning CT scans for breast or chest-wall irradiation. A diagnostic radiologist prospectively reviewed each scan and determined the incidence of previously unknown findings, the impacts of such findings on treatment, and the need for additional radiological studies based on the CT interpretation. Results: Eighty-six scans were prospectively classified as negative findings, 27 scans were classified as incidental benign findings, 26 scans were classified as medically important findings of which only one case was metastatic. Conclusion: The incidence of clinically important coexistent diseases in CT scans for radiation planning in breast irradiation is very low, although the CT scans were performed with intravenous contrast administration insofar as the preoperative evaluation was appropriate.

AB - Objective: The objective of this study was to determine whether diagnostic interpretation of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) images for radiation planning in breast irradiation detects a considerable number of unexpected abnormalities. Materials and methods: One hundred thirty-one patients underwent treatment-planning CT scans for breast or chest-wall irradiation. A diagnostic radiologist prospectively reviewed each scan and determined the incidence of previously unknown findings, the impacts of such findings on treatment, and the need for additional radiological studies based on the CT interpretation. Results: Eighty-six scans were prospectively classified as negative findings, 27 scans were classified as incidental benign findings, 26 scans were classified as medically important findings of which only one case was metastatic. Conclusion: The incidence of clinically important coexistent diseases in CT scans for radiation planning in breast irradiation is very low, although the CT scans were performed with intravenous contrast administration insofar as the preoperative evaluation was appropriate.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=55649100492&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=55649100492&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.clinimag.2008.02.025

DO - 10.1016/j.clinimag.2008.02.025

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 443

EP - 446

JO - Clinical Imaging

JF - Clinical Imaging

SN - 0899-7071

IS - 6

ER -