Truth and Pluralism: Current Debates

Research output: Book/ReportBook

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The relative merits and demerits of historically prominent views such as the correspondence theory, coherentism, pragmatism, verificationism, and instrumentalism have been subject to much attention in the truth literature and have fueled the long-lived debate over which of these views is the most plausible one. While diverging in their specific philosophical commitments, adherents of these historically prominent views agree in at least one fundamental respect. They are all alethic monists. They all endorse the thesis that there is only one property in virtue of which propositions can be true, and so, in this sense, take truth to be one. The truth pluralist, on the other hand, rejects this idea. There are several properties in virtue of which propositions can be true. The literature on truth pluralism has been growing steadily for the past twenty years. This volume, however, is the first of its kind-the first collection of papers focused specifically on pluralism about truth. Part I is dedicated to the development, investigation, and critical discussion of different forms of pluralism. An additional reason to look at truth pluralism with interest is the significant connections it bears to other debates in the truth literature-the debates concerning traditional theories of truth and the deflationism/inflationism divide being cases in hand. Parts II and III of the volume connect truth pluralism to these two debates.

Original languageEnglish
PublisherOxford University Press
Number of pages364
ISBN (Electronic)9780199332427
ISBN (Print)9780195387469
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013 May 23

Fingerprint

Pluralism
Pluralist
Correspondence Theory
Deflationism
Merit
Critical Discussion
Theory of Truth
Instrumentalism
Verificationism
Coherentism
Monist
Pragmatism
Fundamental

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Arts and Humanities(all)

Cite this

Pedersen, Nikolaj J.l. Linding ; Wright, Cory D. / Truth and Pluralism : Current Debates. Oxford University Press, 2013. 364 p.
@book{0b521bcc69474d728f921619caef5119,
title = "Truth and Pluralism: Current Debates",
abstract = "The relative merits and demerits of historically prominent views such as the correspondence theory, coherentism, pragmatism, verificationism, and instrumentalism have been subject to much attention in the truth literature and have fueled the long-lived debate over which of these views is the most plausible one. While diverging in their specific philosophical commitments, adherents of these historically prominent views agree in at least one fundamental respect. They are all alethic monists. They all endorse the thesis that there is only one property in virtue of which propositions can be true, and so, in this sense, take truth to be one. The truth pluralist, on the other hand, rejects this idea. There are several properties in virtue of which propositions can be true. The literature on truth pluralism has been growing steadily for the past twenty years. This volume, however, is the first of its kind-the first collection of papers focused specifically on pluralism about truth. Part I is dedicated to the development, investigation, and critical discussion of different forms of pluralism. An additional reason to look at truth pluralism with interest is the significant connections it bears to other debates in the truth literature-the debates concerning traditional theories of truth and the deflationism/inflationism divide being cases in hand. Parts II and III of the volume connect truth pluralism to these two debates.",
author = "Pedersen, {Nikolaj J.l. Linding} and Wright, {Cory D.}",
year = "2013",
month = "5",
day = "23",
doi = "10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195387469.001.0001",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780195387469",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

Truth and Pluralism : Current Debates. / Pedersen, Nikolaj J.l. Linding; Wright, Cory D.

Oxford University Press, 2013. 364 p.

Research output: Book/ReportBook

TY - BOOK

T1 - Truth and Pluralism

T2 - Current Debates

AU - Pedersen, Nikolaj J.l. Linding

AU - Wright, Cory D.

PY - 2013/5/23

Y1 - 2013/5/23

N2 - The relative merits and demerits of historically prominent views such as the correspondence theory, coherentism, pragmatism, verificationism, and instrumentalism have been subject to much attention in the truth literature and have fueled the long-lived debate over which of these views is the most plausible one. While diverging in their specific philosophical commitments, adherents of these historically prominent views agree in at least one fundamental respect. They are all alethic monists. They all endorse the thesis that there is only one property in virtue of which propositions can be true, and so, in this sense, take truth to be one. The truth pluralist, on the other hand, rejects this idea. There are several properties in virtue of which propositions can be true. The literature on truth pluralism has been growing steadily for the past twenty years. This volume, however, is the first of its kind-the first collection of papers focused specifically on pluralism about truth. Part I is dedicated to the development, investigation, and critical discussion of different forms of pluralism. An additional reason to look at truth pluralism with interest is the significant connections it bears to other debates in the truth literature-the debates concerning traditional theories of truth and the deflationism/inflationism divide being cases in hand. Parts II and III of the volume connect truth pluralism to these two debates.

AB - The relative merits and demerits of historically prominent views such as the correspondence theory, coherentism, pragmatism, verificationism, and instrumentalism have been subject to much attention in the truth literature and have fueled the long-lived debate over which of these views is the most plausible one. While diverging in their specific philosophical commitments, adherents of these historically prominent views agree in at least one fundamental respect. They are all alethic monists. They all endorse the thesis that there is only one property in virtue of which propositions can be true, and so, in this sense, take truth to be one. The truth pluralist, on the other hand, rejects this idea. There are several properties in virtue of which propositions can be true. The literature on truth pluralism has been growing steadily for the past twenty years. This volume, however, is the first of its kind-the first collection of papers focused specifically on pluralism about truth. Part I is dedicated to the development, investigation, and critical discussion of different forms of pluralism. An additional reason to look at truth pluralism with interest is the significant connections it bears to other debates in the truth literature-the debates concerning traditional theories of truth and the deflationism/inflationism divide being cases in hand. Parts II and III of the volume connect truth pluralism to these two debates.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867534768&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84867534768&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195387469.001.0001

DO - 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195387469.001.0001

M3 - Book

AN - SCOPUS:84867534768

SN - 9780195387469

BT - Truth and Pluralism

PB - Oxford University Press

ER -