Two Forms of Affirmative Responses to Polar Questions

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In conversation analysis, questions are explicated in sequential terms. They constrain relevant types and forms of response in the next turn, and the specifics of response construction provide resources that inform how questions and their actions and constraints are understood. This article aims to contribute to our cross-linguistic understandings about question–response sequences by examining responses to polar questions in Korean conversation. It examines two forms of affirmative responses, “unexpanded” and “expanded.” In unexpanded responses that consist of an interjection “yes” alone, respondents do nothing more than a mere affirmation and treat the question as simply seeking (re-)confirmation about the matter that had been conveyed in prior talk. By contrast, in expanded responses that involve additional components after an interjection in the turn, respondents not only affirm the matter at its face value but also provide elaboration addressed to the inferred purpose or intention that may lie behind the question.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)21-46
Number of pages26
JournalDiscourse Processes
Volume52
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Jan 2

Fingerprint

conversation analysis
Linguistics
conversation
linguistics
resources
Polar Questions

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Communication
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

@article{5f28cc5da1f04651b8994d232667a6bd,
title = "Two Forms of Affirmative Responses to Polar Questions",
abstract = "In conversation analysis, questions are explicated in sequential terms. They constrain relevant types and forms of response in the next turn, and the specifics of response construction provide resources that inform how questions and their actions and constraints are understood. This article aims to contribute to our cross-linguistic understandings about question–response sequences by examining responses to polar questions in Korean conversation. It examines two forms of affirmative responses, “unexpanded” and “expanded.” In unexpanded responses that consist of an interjection “yes” alone, respondents do nothing more than a mere affirmation and treat the question as simply seeking (re-)confirmation about the matter that had been conveyed in prior talk. By contrast, in expanded responses that involve additional components after an interjection in the turn, respondents not only affirm the matter at its face value but also provide elaboration addressed to the inferred purpose or intention that may lie behind the question.",
author = "Lee, {Seung Hee}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/0163853X.2014.899001",
language = "English",
volume = "52",
pages = "21--46",
journal = "Discourse Processes",
issn = "0163-853X",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

Two Forms of Affirmative Responses to Polar Questions. / Lee, Seung Hee.

In: Discourse Processes, Vol. 52, No. 1, 02.01.2015, p. 21-46.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Two Forms of Affirmative Responses to Polar Questions

AU - Lee, Seung Hee

PY - 2015/1/2

Y1 - 2015/1/2

N2 - In conversation analysis, questions are explicated in sequential terms. They constrain relevant types and forms of response in the next turn, and the specifics of response construction provide resources that inform how questions and their actions and constraints are understood. This article aims to contribute to our cross-linguistic understandings about question–response sequences by examining responses to polar questions in Korean conversation. It examines two forms of affirmative responses, “unexpanded” and “expanded.” In unexpanded responses that consist of an interjection “yes” alone, respondents do nothing more than a mere affirmation and treat the question as simply seeking (re-)confirmation about the matter that had been conveyed in prior talk. By contrast, in expanded responses that involve additional components after an interjection in the turn, respondents not only affirm the matter at its face value but also provide elaboration addressed to the inferred purpose or intention that may lie behind the question.

AB - In conversation analysis, questions are explicated in sequential terms. They constrain relevant types and forms of response in the next turn, and the specifics of response construction provide resources that inform how questions and their actions and constraints are understood. This article aims to contribute to our cross-linguistic understandings about question–response sequences by examining responses to polar questions in Korean conversation. It examines two forms of affirmative responses, “unexpanded” and “expanded.” In unexpanded responses that consist of an interjection “yes” alone, respondents do nothing more than a mere affirmation and treat the question as simply seeking (re-)confirmation about the matter that had been conveyed in prior talk. By contrast, in expanded responses that involve additional components after an interjection in the turn, respondents not only affirm the matter at its face value but also provide elaboration addressed to the inferred purpose or intention that may lie behind the question.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84919875913&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84919875913&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/0163853X.2014.899001

DO - 10.1080/0163853X.2014.899001

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84919875913

VL - 52

SP - 21

EP - 46

JO - Discourse Processes

JF - Discourse Processes

SN - 0163-853X

IS - 1

ER -