Typological approaches to violence in couples: A critique and alternative conceptual approach

Deborah M. Capaldi, Hyoun K. Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

115 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Typological approaches have become highly influential in the research on violence in couples, and yet issues related to such approaches have not been well addressed. We review the utility of batterer typologies, both for clinical applications and for understanding violence in couples. The principal types of batterer typologies are discussed, along with a number of issues that might limit their utility for explaining the etiology and developmental course of partner violence in couples. We propose a dyadic model of couples' aggression, and we explain ways that such a model provides better conceptualization of the development of the couples' violence over time, including issues of persistence and desistance of violence, and that can help inform prevention and treatment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)253-265
Number of pages13
JournalClinical Psychology Review
Volume27
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2007 Apr 1

Fingerprint

Violence
Aggression
Research

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

@article{8db2b648712f46c2b4ae466955491b1a,
title = "Typological approaches to violence in couples: A critique and alternative conceptual approach",
abstract = "Typological approaches have become highly influential in the research on violence in couples, and yet issues related to such approaches have not been well addressed. We review the utility of batterer typologies, both for clinical applications and for understanding violence in couples. The principal types of batterer typologies are discussed, along with a number of issues that might limit their utility for explaining the etiology and developmental course of partner violence in couples. We propose a dyadic model of couples' aggression, and we explain ways that such a model provides better conceptualization of the development of the couples' violence over time, including issues of persistence and desistance of violence, and that can help inform prevention and treatment.",
author = "Capaldi, {Deborah M.} and Kim, {Hyoun K.}",
year = "2007",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.cpr.2006.09.001",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "253--265",
journal = "Clinical Psychology Review",
issn = "0272-7358",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

Typological approaches to violence in couples : A critique and alternative conceptual approach. / Capaldi, Deborah M.; Kim, Hyoun K.

In: Clinical Psychology Review, Vol. 27, No. 3, 01.04.2007, p. 253-265.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Typological approaches to violence in couples

T2 - A critique and alternative conceptual approach

AU - Capaldi, Deborah M.

AU - Kim, Hyoun K.

PY - 2007/4/1

Y1 - 2007/4/1

N2 - Typological approaches have become highly influential in the research on violence in couples, and yet issues related to such approaches have not been well addressed. We review the utility of batterer typologies, both for clinical applications and for understanding violence in couples. The principal types of batterer typologies are discussed, along with a number of issues that might limit their utility for explaining the etiology and developmental course of partner violence in couples. We propose a dyadic model of couples' aggression, and we explain ways that such a model provides better conceptualization of the development of the couples' violence over time, including issues of persistence and desistance of violence, and that can help inform prevention and treatment.

AB - Typological approaches have become highly influential in the research on violence in couples, and yet issues related to such approaches have not been well addressed. We review the utility of batterer typologies, both for clinical applications and for understanding violence in couples. The principal types of batterer typologies are discussed, along with a number of issues that might limit their utility for explaining the etiology and developmental course of partner violence in couples. We propose a dyadic model of couples' aggression, and we explain ways that such a model provides better conceptualization of the development of the couples' violence over time, including issues of persistence and desistance of violence, and that can help inform prevention and treatment.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33847328454&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33847328454&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cpr.2006.09.001

DO - 10.1016/j.cpr.2006.09.001

M3 - Review article

C2 - 17084496

AN - SCOPUS:33847328454

VL - 27

SP - 253

EP - 265

JO - Clinical Psychology Review

JF - Clinical Psychology Review

SN - 0272-7358

IS - 3

ER -