Underlying processes of SCCT: Mediating roles of preventability, blame, and trust

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Despite the prevalence of the situational crisis communication theory (SCCT; Coombs, 2007) in crisis communication research, few SCCT-based studies have examined how different crisis types affect post-crisis reputation. This study, therefore, attempts to uncover the underlying processes of SCCT. Specifically, this study examined preventability, blame, and trust as potential mediators of crisis type and organizational post-crisis reputation. A between-subjects experimental study (crisis type: victim vs. accidental vs. preventable) was conducted with 329 college students. The results revealed that crisis type had no direct effects on reputation, but it did affect preventability, blame, and trust. More significantly, the results showed that crisis type indirectly affected reputation in two distinct ways: (1) via a sequence of preventability and blame and (2) via trust. The study includes a discussion of theoretical and practical implications.

Original languageEnglish
Article number101775
JournalPublic Relations Review
Volume45
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019 Sep

Fingerprint

Information theory
Students
Communication
reputation
crisis communication
crisis theory
communication theory
communication research

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Communication
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Marketing

Cite this

@article{12d2670ff98d4e17b525883d9fffa501,
title = "Underlying processes of SCCT: Mediating roles of preventability, blame, and trust",
abstract = "Despite the prevalence of the situational crisis communication theory (SCCT; Coombs, 2007) in crisis communication research, few SCCT-based studies have examined how different crisis types affect post-crisis reputation. This study, therefore, attempts to uncover the underlying processes of SCCT. Specifically, this study examined preventability, blame, and trust as potential mediators of crisis type and organizational post-crisis reputation. A between-subjects experimental study (crisis type: victim vs. accidental vs. preventable) was conducted with 329 college students. The results revealed that crisis type had no direct effects on reputation, but it did affect preventability, blame, and trust. More significantly, the results showed that crisis type indirectly affected reputation in two distinct ways: (1) via a sequence of preventability and blame and (2) via trust. The study includes a discussion of theoretical and practical implications.",
author = "Jarim Kim",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.04.008",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
journal = "Public Relations Review",
issn = "0363-8111",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "3",

}

Underlying processes of SCCT : Mediating roles of preventability, blame, and trust. / Kim, Jarim.

In: Public Relations Review, Vol. 45, No. 3, 101775, 09.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Underlying processes of SCCT

T2 - Mediating roles of preventability, blame, and trust

AU - Kim, Jarim

PY - 2019/9

Y1 - 2019/9

N2 - Despite the prevalence of the situational crisis communication theory (SCCT; Coombs, 2007) in crisis communication research, few SCCT-based studies have examined how different crisis types affect post-crisis reputation. This study, therefore, attempts to uncover the underlying processes of SCCT. Specifically, this study examined preventability, blame, and trust as potential mediators of crisis type and organizational post-crisis reputation. A between-subjects experimental study (crisis type: victim vs. accidental vs. preventable) was conducted with 329 college students. The results revealed that crisis type had no direct effects on reputation, but it did affect preventability, blame, and trust. More significantly, the results showed that crisis type indirectly affected reputation in two distinct ways: (1) via a sequence of preventability and blame and (2) via trust. The study includes a discussion of theoretical and practical implications.

AB - Despite the prevalence of the situational crisis communication theory (SCCT; Coombs, 2007) in crisis communication research, few SCCT-based studies have examined how different crisis types affect post-crisis reputation. This study, therefore, attempts to uncover the underlying processes of SCCT. Specifically, this study examined preventability, blame, and trust as potential mediators of crisis type and organizational post-crisis reputation. A between-subjects experimental study (crisis type: victim vs. accidental vs. preventable) was conducted with 329 college students. The results revealed that crisis type had no direct effects on reputation, but it did affect preventability, blame, and trust. More significantly, the results showed that crisis type indirectly affected reputation in two distinct ways: (1) via a sequence of preventability and blame and (2) via trust. The study includes a discussion of theoretical and practical implications.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064397473&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064397473&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.04.008

DO - 10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.04.008

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85064397473

VL - 45

JO - Public Relations Review

JF - Public Relations Review

SN - 0363-8111

IS - 3

M1 - 101775

ER -