Unreliable Third Person Narration? The Case of Katherine Mansfield

Terence Patrick Murphy, Kelly S. Walsh

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The concept of an unreliable third-person narrator may seem a contradiction in terms. The very act of adopting a third-person stance to tell a story would appear to entail an acceptance of a basic need for truth-telling, a commitment to what Wayne Booth terms the implied author's "norms of the work." Nonetheless, in the essay that follows, three of Katherine Mansfield's short stories - "A Cup of Tea" (1922), "Bliss" (1918) and "Revelations" (1920) - will be examined in order to demonstrate how the strategic suppression of the distinction between the voice of the narrator and that of the central character can lead to a strong sense of unreliability. In order to read such narratives effectively, the reader must reappraise the value of certain other stylistic elements, including the use of directives involved with directly quoted speech, seemingly minor discrepancies between adjacent sentences and, perhaps most importantly, the structure of the fiction itself. We contend that Mansfield's use of this form of unreliable third-person fiction is her unique contribution to the short story genre.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)67-85
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Literary Semantics
Volume46
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017 Apr 1

Fingerprint

narration
human being
basic need
suppression
genre
acceptance
commitment
narrative
Person
Narration
Katherine Mansfield
Fiction
Narrator
Short Story

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Literature and Literary Theory

Cite this

@article{a0ceb4e28d62464cba136760e6bac408,
title = "Unreliable Third Person Narration? The Case of Katherine Mansfield",
abstract = "The concept of an unreliable third-person narrator may seem a contradiction in terms. The very act of adopting a third-person stance to tell a story would appear to entail an acceptance of a basic need for truth-telling, a commitment to what Wayne Booth terms the implied author's {"}norms of the work.{"} Nonetheless, in the essay that follows, three of Katherine Mansfield's short stories - {"}A Cup of Tea{"} (1922), {"}Bliss{"} (1918) and {"}Revelations{"} (1920) - will be examined in order to demonstrate how the strategic suppression of the distinction between the voice of the narrator and that of the central character can lead to a strong sense of unreliability. In order to read such narratives effectively, the reader must reappraise the value of certain other stylistic elements, including the use of directives involved with directly quoted speech, seemingly minor discrepancies between adjacent sentences and, perhaps most importantly, the structure of the fiction itself. We contend that Mansfield's use of this form of unreliable third-person fiction is her unique contribution to the short story genre.",
author = "Murphy, {Terence Patrick} and Walsh, {Kelly S.}",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1515/jls-2017-0005",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "67--85",
journal = "Journal of Literary Semantics",
issn = "0341-7638",
publisher = "Walter de Gruyter GmbH",
number = "1",

}

Unreliable Third Person Narration? The Case of Katherine Mansfield. / Murphy, Terence Patrick; Walsh, Kelly S.

In: Journal of Literary Semantics, Vol. 46, No. 1, 01.04.2017, p. 67-85.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Unreliable Third Person Narration? The Case of Katherine Mansfield

AU - Murphy, Terence Patrick

AU - Walsh, Kelly S.

PY - 2017/4/1

Y1 - 2017/4/1

N2 - The concept of an unreliable third-person narrator may seem a contradiction in terms. The very act of adopting a third-person stance to tell a story would appear to entail an acceptance of a basic need for truth-telling, a commitment to what Wayne Booth terms the implied author's "norms of the work." Nonetheless, in the essay that follows, three of Katherine Mansfield's short stories - "A Cup of Tea" (1922), "Bliss" (1918) and "Revelations" (1920) - will be examined in order to demonstrate how the strategic suppression of the distinction between the voice of the narrator and that of the central character can lead to a strong sense of unreliability. In order to read such narratives effectively, the reader must reappraise the value of certain other stylistic elements, including the use of directives involved with directly quoted speech, seemingly minor discrepancies between adjacent sentences and, perhaps most importantly, the structure of the fiction itself. We contend that Mansfield's use of this form of unreliable third-person fiction is her unique contribution to the short story genre.

AB - The concept of an unreliable third-person narrator may seem a contradiction in terms. The very act of adopting a third-person stance to tell a story would appear to entail an acceptance of a basic need for truth-telling, a commitment to what Wayne Booth terms the implied author's "norms of the work." Nonetheless, in the essay that follows, three of Katherine Mansfield's short stories - "A Cup of Tea" (1922), "Bliss" (1918) and "Revelations" (1920) - will be examined in order to demonstrate how the strategic suppression of the distinction between the voice of the narrator and that of the central character can lead to a strong sense of unreliability. In order to read such narratives effectively, the reader must reappraise the value of certain other stylistic elements, including the use of directives involved with directly quoted speech, seemingly minor discrepancies between adjacent sentences and, perhaps most importantly, the structure of the fiction itself. We contend that Mansfield's use of this form of unreliable third-person fiction is her unique contribution to the short story genre.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85017622872&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85017622872&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1515/jls-2017-0005

DO - 10.1515/jls-2017-0005

M3 - Review article

VL - 46

SP - 67

EP - 85

JO - Journal of Literary Semantics

JF - Journal of Literary Semantics

SN - 0341-7638

IS - 1

ER -