Unreliable Third Person Narration? The Case of Katherine Mansfield

Terence Patrick Murphy, Kelly S. Walsh

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The concept of an unreliable third-person narrator may seem a contradiction in terms. The very act of adopting a third-person stance to tell a story would appear to entail an acceptance of a basic need for truth-telling, a commitment to what Wayne Booth terms the implied author's "norms of the work." Nonetheless, in the essay that follows, three of Katherine Mansfield's short stories - "A Cup of Tea" (1922), "Bliss" (1918) and "Revelations" (1920) - will be examined in order to demonstrate how the strategic suppression of the distinction between the voice of the narrator and that of the central character can lead to a strong sense of unreliability. In order to read such narratives effectively, the reader must reappraise the value of certain other stylistic elements, including the use of directives involved with directly quoted speech, seemingly minor discrepancies between adjacent sentences and, perhaps most importantly, the structure of the fiction itself. We contend that Mansfield's use of this form of unreliable third-person fiction is her unique contribution to the short story genre.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)67-85
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Literary Semantics
Volume46
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017 Apr 1

    Fingerprint

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Literature and Literary Theory

Cite this