TY - JOUR
T1 - Upgrading the Science and Technology of Assessment and Diagnosis
T2 - Laboratory and Clinic-Based Assessment of Children with ADHD
AU - Rapport, Mark D.
AU - Chung, Kyong Mee
AU - Shore, Gail
AU - Denney, Colin B.
AU - Isaacs, Patti
PY - 2000
Y1 - 2000
N2 - Reviews the usefulness of clinic-based and laboratory-based instruments and paradigms for diagnosing attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and monitoring treatment effects. Extant literature examining the performance of normal children and those with ADHD on an extensive range ofneurocognitive tests, tasks, and experimental paradigms indicates that particular types of instruments may be more reliable than others with respect to detecting between-group differences. We review task parameters that may distinguish the more reliable from less reliable instruments. The value of clinic-based and laboratory-based instruments for monitoring treatment response in children with ADHD is questionable when evaluated in the context of ecologically relevant variables such as classroom behavior and academic functioning. We present a general conceptual model to highlight conceptual issues relevant to designing clinic-based and laboratory-based instruments for the purposes of diagnosing and monitoring treatment effects in children with ADHD. Application of the model to currently conceptualized core variables indicates that attention and impulsivity-hyperactivity may represent correlative rather than core features of the disorder. We discuss implications of these findings for designing the next generation of clinic-based and laboratory-based instruments.
AB - Reviews the usefulness of clinic-based and laboratory-based instruments and paradigms for diagnosing attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and monitoring treatment effects. Extant literature examining the performance of normal children and those with ADHD on an extensive range ofneurocognitive tests, tasks, and experimental paradigms indicates that particular types of instruments may be more reliable than others with respect to detecting between-group differences. We review task parameters that may distinguish the more reliable from less reliable instruments. The value of clinic-based and laboratory-based instruments for monitoring treatment response in children with ADHD is questionable when evaluated in the context of ecologically relevant variables such as classroom behavior and academic functioning. We present a general conceptual model to highlight conceptual issues relevant to designing clinic-based and laboratory-based instruments for the purposes of diagnosing and monitoring treatment effects in children with ADHD. Application of the model to currently conceptualized core variables indicates that attention and impulsivity-hyperactivity may represent correlative rather than core features of the disorder. We discuss implications of these findings for designing the next generation of clinic-based and laboratory-based instruments.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034544365&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034544365&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1207/S15374424JCCP2904_8
DO - 10.1207/S15374424JCCP2904_8
M3 - Article
C2 - 11126633
AN - SCOPUS:0034544365
SN - 1537-4416
VL - 29
SP - 555
EP - 568
JO - Journal of clinical child psychology
JF - Journal of clinical child psychology
IS - 4
ER -