Upgrading the Science and Technology of Assessment and Diagnosis

Laboratory and Clinic-Based Assessment of Children with ADHD

Mark D. Rapport, Kyong Mee Chung, Gail Shore, Colin B. Denney, Patti Isaacs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

68 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Reviews the usefulness of clinic-based and laboratory-based instruments and paradigms for diagnosing attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and monitoring treatment effects. Extant literature examining the performance of normal children and those with ADHD on an extensive range ofneurocognitive tests, tasks, and experimental paradigms indicates that particular types of instruments may be more reliable than others with respect to detecting between-group differences. We review task parameters that may distinguish the more reliable from less reliable instruments. The value of clinic-based and laboratory-based instruments for monitoring treatment response in children with ADHD is questionable when evaluated in the context of ecologically relevant variables such as classroom behavior and academic functioning. We present a general conceptual model to highlight conceptual issues relevant to designing clinic-based and laboratory-based instruments for the purposes of diagnosing and monitoring treatment effects in children with ADHD. Application of the model to currently conceptualized core variables indicates that attention and impulsivity-hyperactivity may represent correlative rather than core features of the disorder. We discuss implications of these findings for designing the next generation of clinic-based and laboratory-based instruments.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)555-568
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology
Volume29
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2000 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Biomedical Technology Assessment
Clinical Laboratory Techniques
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity
Impulsive Behavior
Therapeutics

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

@article{91af34b7e82f4ca88b3e7371808fcdda,
title = "Upgrading the Science and Technology of Assessment and Diagnosis: Laboratory and Clinic-Based Assessment of Children with ADHD",
abstract = "Reviews the usefulness of clinic-based and laboratory-based instruments and paradigms for diagnosing attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and monitoring treatment effects. Extant literature examining the performance of normal children and those with ADHD on an extensive range ofneurocognitive tests, tasks, and experimental paradigms indicates that particular types of instruments may be more reliable than others with respect to detecting between-group differences. We review task parameters that may distinguish the more reliable from less reliable instruments. The value of clinic-based and laboratory-based instruments for monitoring treatment response in children with ADHD is questionable when evaluated in the context of ecologically relevant variables such as classroom behavior and academic functioning. We present a general conceptual model to highlight conceptual issues relevant to designing clinic-based and laboratory-based instruments for the purposes of diagnosing and monitoring treatment effects in children with ADHD. Application of the model to currently conceptualized core variables indicates that attention and impulsivity-hyperactivity may represent correlative rather than core features of the disorder. We discuss implications of these findings for designing the next generation of clinic-based and laboratory-based instruments.",
author = "Rapport, {Mark D.} and Chung, {Kyong Mee} and Gail Shore and Denney, {Colin B.} and Patti Isaacs",
year = "2000",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1207/S15374424JCCP2904_8",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "555--568",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology",
issn = "1537-4416",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

Upgrading the Science and Technology of Assessment and Diagnosis : Laboratory and Clinic-Based Assessment of Children with ADHD. / Rapport, Mark D.; Chung, Kyong Mee; Shore, Gail; Denney, Colin B.; Isaacs, Patti.

In: Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, Vol. 29, No. 4, 01.01.2000, p. 555-568.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Upgrading the Science and Technology of Assessment and Diagnosis

T2 - Laboratory and Clinic-Based Assessment of Children with ADHD

AU - Rapport, Mark D.

AU - Chung, Kyong Mee

AU - Shore, Gail

AU - Denney, Colin B.

AU - Isaacs, Patti

PY - 2000/1/1

Y1 - 2000/1/1

N2 - Reviews the usefulness of clinic-based and laboratory-based instruments and paradigms for diagnosing attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and monitoring treatment effects. Extant literature examining the performance of normal children and those with ADHD on an extensive range ofneurocognitive tests, tasks, and experimental paradigms indicates that particular types of instruments may be more reliable than others with respect to detecting between-group differences. We review task parameters that may distinguish the more reliable from less reliable instruments. The value of clinic-based and laboratory-based instruments for monitoring treatment response in children with ADHD is questionable when evaluated in the context of ecologically relevant variables such as classroom behavior and academic functioning. We present a general conceptual model to highlight conceptual issues relevant to designing clinic-based and laboratory-based instruments for the purposes of diagnosing and monitoring treatment effects in children with ADHD. Application of the model to currently conceptualized core variables indicates that attention and impulsivity-hyperactivity may represent correlative rather than core features of the disorder. We discuss implications of these findings for designing the next generation of clinic-based and laboratory-based instruments.

AB - Reviews the usefulness of clinic-based and laboratory-based instruments and paradigms for diagnosing attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and monitoring treatment effects. Extant literature examining the performance of normal children and those with ADHD on an extensive range ofneurocognitive tests, tasks, and experimental paradigms indicates that particular types of instruments may be more reliable than others with respect to detecting between-group differences. We review task parameters that may distinguish the more reliable from less reliable instruments. The value of clinic-based and laboratory-based instruments for monitoring treatment response in children with ADHD is questionable when evaluated in the context of ecologically relevant variables such as classroom behavior and academic functioning. We present a general conceptual model to highlight conceptual issues relevant to designing clinic-based and laboratory-based instruments for the purposes of diagnosing and monitoring treatment effects in children with ADHD. Application of the model to currently conceptualized core variables indicates that attention and impulsivity-hyperactivity may represent correlative rather than core features of the disorder. We discuss implications of these findings for designing the next generation of clinic-based and laboratory-based instruments.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034544365&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034544365&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1207/S15374424JCCP2904_8

DO - 10.1207/S15374424JCCP2904_8

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 555

EP - 568

JO - Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology

JF - Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology

SN - 1537-4416

IS - 4

ER -