Using Native-Speaker Psycholinguistic Norms to Predict Lexical Proficiency and Development in Second-Language Production

Cynthia M. Berger, Scott A. Crossley, Kristopher Kyle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A large data set of L1 psycholinguistic norms (Balota et al. 2007) was used to assess spoken L2 English lexical proficiency in cross-sectional and longitudinal learner corpora. Behavioral norms included lexical decision and word naming latencies (i.e. reaction times) and accuracies for 40,481 English words. A frequency measure was included to compare the relative strength of the norms to a traditional lexical measure when explaining proficiency and growth. The cross-sectional study revealed that learners identified as more lexically proficient by human raters produced words that were recognized more slowly and named more slowly and less accurately in L1 experimental settings. Moreover, lexical decision latencies explained more variance in ratings than frequency, while frequency and word naming latencies were comparable. The longitudinal study indicated that words produced by L2 speakers over time were recognized less accurately and named more slowly and less accurately by L1 subjects, while the frequency of those words decreased over time. Together, results demonstrate that L1 psycholinguistic information can index L2 lexical proficiency and growth across corpora while adding unique information to our understanding of L2 lexical knowledge.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)22-42
Number of pages21
JournalApplied Linguistics
Volume40
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019 Feb 1

Fingerprint

psycholinguistics
language
behavioral norm
cross-sectional study
longitudinal study
rating
time
Lexical Development
Native Speaker
Psycholinguistics
Language Production
Lexical Proficiency
Lexical Decision
Word Naming
Naming Latency

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Communication
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

@article{0fd2b030f9914713a8bf7343a455f974,
title = "Using Native-Speaker Psycholinguistic Norms to Predict Lexical Proficiency and Development in Second-Language Production",
abstract = "A large data set of L1 psycholinguistic norms (Balota et al. 2007) was used to assess spoken L2 English lexical proficiency in cross-sectional and longitudinal learner corpora. Behavioral norms included lexical decision and word naming latencies (i.e. reaction times) and accuracies for 40,481 English words. A frequency measure was included to compare the relative strength of the norms to a traditional lexical measure when explaining proficiency and growth. The cross-sectional study revealed that learners identified as more lexically proficient by human raters produced words that were recognized more slowly and named more slowly and less accurately in L1 experimental settings. Moreover, lexical decision latencies explained more variance in ratings than frequency, while frequency and word naming latencies were comparable. The longitudinal study indicated that words produced by L2 speakers over time were recognized less accurately and named more slowly and less accurately by L1 subjects, while the frequency of those words decreased over time. Together, results demonstrate that L1 psycholinguistic information can index L2 lexical proficiency and growth across corpora while adding unique information to our understanding of L2 lexical knowledge.",
author = "Berger, {Cynthia M.} and Crossley, {Scott A.} and Kristopher Kyle",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/applin/amx005",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "22--42",
journal = "Applied Linguistics",
issn = "0142-6001",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

Using Native-Speaker Psycholinguistic Norms to Predict Lexical Proficiency and Development in Second-Language Production. / Berger, Cynthia M.; Crossley, Scott A.; Kyle, Kristopher.

In: Applied Linguistics, Vol. 40, No. 1, 01.02.2019, p. 22-42.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using Native-Speaker Psycholinguistic Norms to Predict Lexical Proficiency and Development in Second-Language Production

AU - Berger, Cynthia M.

AU - Crossley, Scott A.

AU - Kyle, Kristopher

PY - 2019/2/1

Y1 - 2019/2/1

N2 - A large data set of L1 psycholinguistic norms (Balota et al. 2007) was used to assess spoken L2 English lexical proficiency in cross-sectional and longitudinal learner corpora. Behavioral norms included lexical decision and word naming latencies (i.e. reaction times) and accuracies for 40,481 English words. A frequency measure was included to compare the relative strength of the norms to a traditional lexical measure when explaining proficiency and growth. The cross-sectional study revealed that learners identified as more lexically proficient by human raters produced words that were recognized more slowly and named more slowly and less accurately in L1 experimental settings. Moreover, lexical decision latencies explained more variance in ratings than frequency, while frequency and word naming latencies were comparable. The longitudinal study indicated that words produced by L2 speakers over time were recognized less accurately and named more slowly and less accurately by L1 subjects, while the frequency of those words decreased over time. Together, results demonstrate that L1 psycholinguistic information can index L2 lexical proficiency and growth across corpora while adding unique information to our understanding of L2 lexical knowledge.

AB - A large data set of L1 psycholinguistic norms (Balota et al. 2007) was used to assess spoken L2 English lexical proficiency in cross-sectional and longitudinal learner corpora. Behavioral norms included lexical decision and word naming latencies (i.e. reaction times) and accuracies for 40,481 English words. A frequency measure was included to compare the relative strength of the norms to a traditional lexical measure when explaining proficiency and growth. The cross-sectional study revealed that learners identified as more lexically proficient by human raters produced words that were recognized more slowly and named more slowly and less accurately in L1 experimental settings. Moreover, lexical decision latencies explained more variance in ratings than frequency, while frequency and word naming latencies were comparable. The longitudinal study indicated that words produced by L2 speakers over time were recognized less accurately and named more slowly and less accurately by L1 subjects, while the frequency of those words decreased over time. Together, results demonstrate that L1 psycholinguistic information can index L2 lexical proficiency and growth across corpora while adding unique information to our understanding of L2 lexical knowledge.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056408212&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85056408212&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/applin/amx005

DO - 10.1093/applin/amx005

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85056408212

VL - 40

SP - 22

EP - 42

JO - Applied Linguistics

JF - Applied Linguistics

SN - 0142-6001

IS - 1

ER -