Vacuum-assisted breast biopsy under ultrasonographic guidance

Analysis of a 10-year experience

Seung Hyun Lee, Eunkyung Kim, minjung Kim, Hee Jung Moon, Jung Hyun Yoon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the indications and the diagnostic accuracy of vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VABB) under ultrasonographic (US) guidance based on a 10-year period of clinical use. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of 2,920 breast lesions in 2,477 consecutive patients who underwent US-guided VABB between February 2002 and December 2011. The proportions of each indication for VABB were analyzed as well as the trend of its use over divided time periods. Histopathological diagnosis and the malignancy rate of the lesions with VABB were analyzed. A comparison of the pathological diagnosis of VABB and the gold standard diagnosis revealed the false negative rate, the underestimation rate, and the agreement rate. Results: Palpable lesions (44.4%), low-suspicion lesions (15.7%), high-risk lesions (12.4%), and calcifications (10.3%) were the most common indications for US-guided VABB. The malignancy rate of lesions submitted to VABB was 5.4%. The false negative rate was only 0.1%, while the underestimation rate of high-risk lesions and ductal carcinoma in situ was 3.1% and 13.8%, respectively, with a 98.7% agreement rate. Among 1,512 therapeutic VABB cases, 84.9% showed no residual or recurrent lesions on long term follow-up US for more than a year. Complications occurred in 1% of the patients without need for surgical intervention. Conclusion: US-guided VABB is an accurate and safe method that can help decision-making in the diagnostic process and can be an alternative for excisional surgery in some therapeutic circumstances.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)259-266
Number of pages8
JournalUltrasonography
Volume33
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014 Feb 26

Fingerprint

Vacuum
Breast
Biopsy
Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating
Neoplasms
Decision Making
Therapeutics

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Lee, Seung Hyun ; Kim, Eunkyung ; Kim, minjung ; Moon, Hee Jung ; Yoon, Jung Hyun. / Vacuum-assisted breast biopsy under ultrasonographic guidance : Analysis of a 10-year experience. In: Ultrasonography. 2014 ; Vol. 33, No. 4. pp. 259-266.
@article{f7709a7d30214a02a8e1adf95c614996,
title = "Vacuum-assisted breast biopsy under ultrasonographic guidance: Analysis of a 10-year experience",
abstract = "Purpose: To determine the indications and the diagnostic accuracy of vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VABB) under ultrasonographic (US) guidance based on a 10-year period of clinical use. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of 2,920 breast lesions in 2,477 consecutive patients who underwent US-guided VABB between February 2002 and December 2011. The proportions of each indication for VABB were analyzed as well as the trend of its use over divided time periods. Histopathological diagnosis and the malignancy rate of the lesions with VABB were analyzed. A comparison of the pathological diagnosis of VABB and the gold standard diagnosis revealed the false negative rate, the underestimation rate, and the agreement rate. Results: Palpable lesions (44.4{\%}), low-suspicion lesions (15.7{\%}), high-risk lesions (12.4{\%}), and calcifications (10.3{\%}) were the most common indications for US-guided VABB. The malignancy rate of lesions submitted to VABB was 5.4{\%}. The false negative rate was only 0.1{\%}, while the underestimation rate of high-risk lesions and ductal carcinoma in situ was 3.1{\%} and 13.8{\%}, respectively, with a 98.7{\%} agreement rate. Among 1,512 therapeutic VABB cases, 84.9{\%} showed no residual or recurrent lesions on long term follow-up US for more than a year. Complications occurred in 1{\%} of the patients without need for surgical intervention. Conclusion: US-guided VABB is an accurate and safe method that can help decision-making in the diagnostic process and can be an alternative for excisional surgery in some therapeutic circumstances.",
author = "Lee, {Seung Hyun} and Eunkyung Kim and minjung Kim and Moon, {Hee Jung} and Yoon, {Jung Hyun}",
year = "2014",
month = "2",
day = "26",
doi = "10.14366/usg.14020",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "259--266",
journal = "Ultrasonography",
issn = "2288-5919",
publisher = "Korean Society of Ultrasound in Medicine",
number = "4",

}

Vacuum-assisted breast biopsy under ultrasonographic guidance : Analysis of a 10-year experience. / Lee, Seung Hyun; Kim, Eunkyung; Kim, minjung; Moon, Hee Jung; Yoon, Jung Hyun.

In: Ultrasonography, Vol. 33, No. 4, 26.02.2014, p. 259-266.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Vacuum-assisted breast biopsy under ultrasonographic guidance

T2 - Analysis of a 10-year experience

AU - Lee, Seung Hyun

AU - Kim, Eunkyung

AU - Kim, minjung

AU - Moon, Hee Jung

AU - Yoon, Jung Hyun

PY - 2014/2/26

Y1 - 2014/2/26

N2 - Purpose: To determine the indications and the diagnostic accuracy of vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VABB) under ultrasonographic (US) guidance based on a 10-year period of clinical use. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of 2,920 breast lesions in 2,477 consecutive patients who underwent US-guided VABB between February 2002 and December 2011. The proportions of each indication for VABB were analyzed as well as the trend of its use over divided time periods. Histopathological diagnosis and the malignancy rate of the lesions with VABB were analyzed. A comparison of the pathological diagnosis of VABB and the gold standard diagnosis revealed the false negative rate, the underestimation rate, and the agreement rate. Results: Palpable lesions (44.4%), low-suspicion lesions (15.7%), high-risk lesions (12.4%), and calcifications (10.3%) were the most common indications for US-guided VABB. The malignancy rate of lesions submitted to VABB was 5.4%. The false negative rate was only 0.1%, while the underestimation rate of high-risk lesions and ductal carcinoma in situ was 3.1% and 13.8%, respectively, with a 98.7% agreement rate. Among 1,512 therapeutic VABB cases, 84.9% showed no residual or recurrent lesions on long term follow-up US for more than a year. Complications occurred in 1% of the patients without need for surgical intervention. Conclusion: US-guided VABB is an accurate and safe method that can help decision-making in the diagnostic process and can be an alternative for excisional surgery in some therapeutic circumstances.

AB - Purpose: To determine the indications and the diagnostic accuracy of vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VABB) under ultrasonographic (US) guidance based on a 10-year period of clinical use. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of 2,920 breast lesions in 2,477 consecutive patients who underwent US-guided VABB between February 2002 and December 2011. The proportions of each indication for VABB were analyzed as well as the trend of its use over divided time periods. Histopathological diagnosis and the malignancy rate of the lesions with VABB were analyzed. A comparison of the pathological diagnosis of VABB and the gold standard diagnosis revealed the false negative rate, the underestimation rate, and the agreement rate. Results: Palpable lesions (44.4%), low-suspicion lesions (15.7%), high-risk lesions (12.4%), and calcifications (10.3%) were the most common indications for US-guided VABB. The malignancy rate of lesions submitted to VABB was 5.4%. The false negative rate was only 0.1%, while the underestimation rate of high-risk lesions and ductal carcinoma in situ was 3.1% and 13.8%, respectively, with a 98.7% agreement rate. Among 1,512 therapeutic VABB cases, 84.9% showed no residual or recurrent lesions on long term follow-up US for more than a year. Complications occurred in 1% of the patients without need for surgical intervention. Conclusion: US-guided VABB is an accurate and safe method that can help decision-making in the diagnostic process and can be an alternative for excisional surgery in some therapeutic circumstances.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014493632&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85014493632&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.14366/usg.14020

DO - 10.14366/usg.14020

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 259

EP - 266

JO - Ultrasonography

JF - Ultrasonography

SN - 2288-5919

IS - 4

ER -