Validation of the fifth edition BI-RADS ultrasound lexicon with comparison of fourth and fifth edition diagnostic performance using video clips

Jung Hyun Yoon, minjung Kim, Hye Sun Lee, Sung Hun Kim, Ji Hyun Youk, Sun Hye Jeong, You Me Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the positive predictive value (PPV) and the diagnostic performance of the ultrasonographic descriptors in the fifth edition of BI-RADS, comparing with the fourth edition using video clips. Methods: From September 2013 to July 2014, 80 breast masses in 74 women (mean age, 47.5±10.7 years) from five institutions of the Korean Society of Breast Imaging were included. Two radiologists individually reviewed the static and video images and analyzed the images according to the fourth and fifth edition of BI-RADS. The PPV of each descriptor was calculated and diagnostic performances between the fourth and fifth editions were compared. Results: Of the 80 breast masses, 51 (63.8%) were benign and 29 (36.2%) were malignant. Suspicious ultrasonographic features such as irregular shape, non-parallel orientation, angular or spiculated margins, and combined posterior features showed higher PPV in both editions (all P<0.05). No significant differences were found in the diagnostic performances between the two editions (all P>0.05). The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve was higher in the fourth edition (0.708 to 0.690), without significance (P=0.416). Conclusion: The fifth edition of the BI-RADS ultrasound lexicon showed comparable performance to the fourth edition and can be useful in the differential diagnosis of breast masses using ultrasonography.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)318-326
Number of pages9
JournalUltrasonography
Volume35
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Oct 1

Fingerprint

Surgical Instruments
Breast
ROC Curve
Ultrasonography
Differential Diagnosis

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Yoon, Jung Hyun ; Kim, minjung ; Lee, Hye Sun ; Kim, Sung Hun ; Youk, Ji Hyun ; Jeong, Sun Hye ; Kim, You Me. / Validation of the fifth edition BI-RADS ultrasound lexicon with comparison of fourth and fifth edition diagnostic performance using video clips. In: Ultrasonography. 2016 ; Vol. 35, No. 4. pp. 318-326.
@article{5b7ee5ea34ee4ff9897df80a1f51e09f,
title = "Validation of the fifth edition BI-RADS ultrasound lexicon with comparison of fourth and fifth edition diagnostic performance using video clips",
abstract = "Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the positive predictive value (PPV) and the diagnostic performance of the ultrasonographic descriptors in the fifth edition of BI-RADS, comparing with the fourth edition using video clips. Methods: From September 2013 to July 2014, 80 breast masses in 74 women (mean age, 47.5±10.7 years) from five institutions of the Korean Society of Breast Imaging were included. Two radiologists individually reviewed the static and video images and analyzed the images according to the fourth and fifth edition of BI-RADS. The PPV of each descriptor was calculated and diagnostic performances between the fourth and fifth editions were compared. Results: Of the 80 breast masses, 51 (63.8{\%}) were benign and 29 (36.2{\%}) were malignant. Suspicious ultrasonographic features such as irregular shape, non-parallel orientation, angular or spiculated margins, and combined posterior features showed higher PPV in both editions (all P<0.05). No significant differences were found in the diagnostic performances between the two editions (all P>0.05). The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve was higher in the fourth edition (0.708 to 0.690), without significance (P=0.416). Conclusion: The fifth edition of the BI-RADS ultrasound lexicon showed comparable performance to the fourth edition and can be useful in the differential diagnosis of breast masses using ultrasonography.",
author = "Yoon, {Jung Hyun} and minjung Kim and Lee, {Hye Sun} and Kim, {Sung Hun} and Youk, {Ji Hyun} and Jeong, {Sun Hye} and Kim, {You Me}",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.14366/usg.16010",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "318--326",
journal = "Ultrasonography",
issn = "2288-5919",
publisher = "Korean Society of Ultrasound in Medicine",
number = "4",

}

Validation of the fifth edition BI-RADS ultrasound lexicon with comparison of fourth and fifth edition diagnostic performance using video clips. / Yoon, Jung Hyun; Kim, minjung; Lee, Hye Sun; Kim, Sung Hun; Youk, Ji Hyun; Jeong, Sun Hye; Kim, You Me.

In: Ultrasonography, Vol. 35, No. 4, 01.10.2016, p. 318-326.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validation of the fifth edition BI-RADS ultrasound lexicon with comparison of fourth and fifth edition diagnostic performance using video clips

AU - Yoon, Jung Hyun

AU - Kim, minjung

AU - Lee, Hye Sun

AU - Kim, Sung Hun

AU - Youk, Ji Hyun

AU - Jeong, Sun Hye

AU - Kim, You Me

PY - 2016/10/1

Y1 - 2016/10/1

N2 - Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the positive predictive value (PPV) and the diagnostic performance of the ultrasonographic descriptors in the fifth edition of BI-RADS, comparing with the fourth edition using video clips. Methods: From September 2013 to July 2014, 80 breast masses in 74 women (mean age, 47.5±10.7 years) from five institutions of the Korean Society of Breast Imaging were included. Two radiologists individually reviewed the static and video images and analyzed the images according to the fourth and fifth edition of BI-RADS. The PPV of each descriptor was calculated and diagnostic performances between the fourth and fifth editions were compared. Results: Of the 80 breast masses, 51 (63.8%) were benign and 29 (36.2%) were malignant. Suspicious ultrasonographic features such as irregular shape, non-parallel orientation, angular or spiculated margins, and combined posterior features showed higher PPV in both editions (all P<0.05). No significant differences were found in the diagnostic performances between the two editions (all P>0.05). The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve was higher in the fourth edition (0.708 to 0.690), without significance (P=0.416). Conclusion: The fifth edition of the BI-RADS ultrasound lexicon showed comparable performance to the fourth edition and can be useful in the differential diagnosis of breast masses using ultrasonography.

AB - Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the positive predictive value (PPV) and the diagnostic performance of the ultrasonographic descriptors in the fifth edition of BI-RADS, comparing with the fourth edition using video clips. Methods: From September 2013 to July 2014, 80 breast masses in 74 women (mean age, 47.5±10.7 years) from five institutions of the Korean Society of Breast Imaging were included. Two radiologists individually reviewed the static and video images and analyzed the images according to the fourth and fifth edition of BI-RADS. The PPV of each descriptor was calculated and diagnostic performances between the fourth and fifth editions were compared. Results: Of the 80 breast masses, 51 (63.8%) were benign and 29 (36.2%) were malignant. Suspicious ultrasonographic features such as irregular shape, non-parallel orientation, angular or spiculated margins, and combined posterior features showed higher PPV in both editions (all P<0.05). No significant differences were found in the diagnostic performances between the two editions (all P>0.05). The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve was higher in the fourth edition (0.708 to 0.690), without significance (P=0.416). Conclusion: The fifth edition of the BI-RADS ultrasound lexicon showed comparable performance to the fourth edition and can be useful in the differential diagnosis of breast masses using ultrasonography.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046060991&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85046060991&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.14366/usg.16010

DO - 10.14366/usg.16010

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85046060991

VL - 35

SP - 318

EP - 326

JO - Ultrasonography

JF - Ultrasonography

SN - 2288-5919

IS - 4

ER -