Value of specimen radiographs in diagnosing multifocality of thyroid cancer

J. Y. Kwak, E. K. Kim, S. W. Hong, M. J. Kim, H. J. Moon, C. S. Park

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Specimen radiography has been used widely to evaluate the complete excision of calcified breast lesions but has not been evaluated for thyroid cancer. Methods: Specimen radiographs were evaluated retrospectively to identify additional cancers that were demonstrated only as calcifications. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to compare the combination of specimen radiography and ultrasonography versus ultrasonography alone for detecting multifocality. Results: Some 122 thyroid cancer specimens were obtained from 122 patients between January and April 2008. Specimen radiography detected 27 cancers (18.5 per cent) not detected by ultrasonography. Diagnoses were changed after evaluation of specimen radiographs in three of these patients. The area under the curve of the combination of specimen radiography and ultrasonography was significantly higher than that of ultrasonography alone (P = 0.005). Conclusion: Specimen radiography is a potentially useful tool for diagnosing cancer type and predicting the extent of thyroid cancer.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)517-524
Number of pages8
JournalBritish Journal of Surgery
Volume97
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010 Apr 1

Fingerprint

Thyroid Neoplasms
Radiography
Ultrasonography
Neoplasms
ROC Curve
Area Under Curve
Breast

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery

Cite this

@article{1e609de891c945818fbb8ace916b6306,
title = "Value of specimen radiographs in diagnosing multifocality of thyroid cancer",
abstract = "Background: Specimen radiography has been used widely to evaluate the complete excision of calcified breast lesions but has not been evaluated for thyroid cancer. Methods: Specimen radiographs were evaluated retrospectively to identify additional cancers that were demonstrated only as calcifications. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to compare the combination of specimen radiography and ultrasonography versus ultrasonography alone for detecting multifocality. Results: Some 122 thyroid cancer specimens were obtained from 122 patients between January and April 2008. Specimen radiography detected 27 cancers (18.5 per cent) not detected by ultrasonography. Diagnoses were changed after evaluation of specimen radiographs in three of these patients. The area under the curve of the combination of specimen radiography and ultrasonography was significantly higher than that of ultrasonography alone (P = 0.005). Conclusion: Specimen radiography is a potentially useful tool for diagnosing cancer type and predicting the extent of thyroid cancer.",
author = "Kwak, {J. Y.} and Kim, {E. K.} and Hong, {S. W.} and Kim, {M. J.} and Moon, {H. J.} and Park, {C. S.}",
year = "2010",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/bjs.6943",
language = "English",
volume = "97",
pages = "517--524",
journal = "British Journal of Surgery",
issn = "0007-1323",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "4",

}

Value of specimen radiographs in diagnosing multifocality of thyroid cancer. / Kwak, J. Y.; Kim, E. K.; Hong, S. W.; Kim, M. J.; Moon, H. J.; Park, C. S.

In: British Journal of Surgery, Vol. 97, No. 4, 01.04.2010, p. 517-524.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Value of specimen radiographs in diagnosing multifocality of thyroid cancer

AU - Kwak, J. Y.

AU - Kim, E. K.

AU - Hong, S. W.

AU - Kim, M. J.

AU - Moon, H. J.

AU - Park, C. S.

PY - 2010/4/1

Y1 - 2010/4/1

N2 - Background: Specimen radiography has been used widely to evaluate the complete excision of calcified breast lesions but has not been evaluated for thyroid cancer. Methods: Specimen radiographs were evaluated retrospectively to identify additional cancers that were demonstrated only as calcifications. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to compare the combination of specimen radiography and ultrasonography versus ultrasonography alone for detecting multifocality. Results: Some 122 thyroid cancer specimens were obtained from 122 patients between January and April 2008. Specimen radiography detected 27 cancers (18.5 per cent) not detected by ultrasonography. Diagnoses were changed after evaluation of specimen radiographs in three of these patients. The area under the curve of the combination of specimen radiography and ultrasonography was significantly higher than that of ultrasonography alone (P = 0.005). Conclusion: Specimen radiography is a potentially useful tool for diagnosing cancer type and predicting the extent of thyroid cancer.

AB - Background: Specimen radiography has been used widely to evaluate the complete excision of calcified breast lesions but has not been evaluated for thyroid cancer. Methods: Specimen radiographs were evaluated retrospectively to identify additional cancers that were demonstrated only as calcifications. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to compare the combination of specimen radiography and ultrasonography versus ultrasonography alone for detecting multifocality. Results: Some 122 thyroid cancer specimens were obtained from 122 patients between January and April 2008. Specimen radiography detected 27 cancers (18.5 per cent) not detected by ultrasonography. Diagnoses were changed after evaluation of specimen radiographs in three of these patients. The area under the curve of the combination of specimen radiography and ultrasonography was significantly higher than that of ultrasonography alone (P = 0.005). Conclusion: Specimen radiography is a potentially useful tool for diagnosing cancer type and predicting the extent of thyroid cancer.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77949385928&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77949385928&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/bjs.6943

DO - 10.1002/bjs.6943

M3 - Article

C2 - 20169570

AN - SCOPUS:77949385928

VL - 97

SP - 517

EP - 524

JO - British Journal of Surgery

JF - British Journal of Surgery

SN - 0007-1323

IS - 4

ER -