Valuing academic patents and intellectual properties: Different perspectives of willingness to pay and sell

So Young Sohn, Won Sang Lee, Yong Han Ju

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Academic inventors tend to lack the ability of valuing technologies in their areas. We apply classification tree analysis to discover different perspectives of Willingness to Pay (WTP) and Sell (WTS) of academic inventors when valuing their patents and technologies. Predictor factors considered are development environment, technology characteristics, ownership and patenting policy, and technology transfer characteristics. According to the result of Korean student data, WTS and WTP are differently perceived for the same technology: WTP is higher than WTS for the low valued technologies. The ownership policy, scalability and degree of innovation of technology, among the discovery of significant factors on WTS and WTP, are mainly considered as the important factors on WTS and WTP. From the finding of this research, we provide the policy implication on academic patenting and its ownership for further development of academic patents.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)13-24
Number of pages12
JournalTechnovation
Volume33
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Intellectual property
Technology transfer
Willingness-to-pay
Patents
Scalability
Innovation
Students

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Engineering(all)
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Cite this

@article{d40203f550c7452fa326c6166784ebde,
title = "Valuing academic patents and intellectual properties: Different perspectives of willingness to pay and sell",
abstract = "Academic inventors tend to lack the ability of valuing technologies in their areas. We apply classification tree analysis to discover different perspectives of Willingness to Pay (WTP) and Sell (WTS) of academic inventors when valuing their patents and technologies. Predictor factors considered are development environment, technology characteristics, ownership and patenting policy, and technology transfer characteristics. According to the result of Korean student data, WTS and WTP are differently perceived for the same technology: WTP is higher than WTS for the low valued technologies. The ownership policy, scalability and degree of innovation of technology, among the discovery of significant factors on WTS and WTP, are mainly considered as the important factors on WTS and WTP. From the finding of this research, we provide the policy implication on academic patenting and its ownership for further development of academic patents.",
author = "Sohn, {So Young} and Lee, {Won Sang} and Ju, {Yong Han}",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.technovation.2012.10.003",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "13--24",
journal = "Technovation",
issn = "0166-4972",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "1",

}

Valuing academic patents and intellectual properties : Different perspectives of willingness to pay and sell. / Sohn, So Young; Lee, Won Sang; Ju, Yong Han.

In: Technovation, Vol. 33, No. 1, 01.01.2013, p. 13-24.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Valuing academic patents and intellectual properties

T2 - Different perspectives of willingness to pay and sell

AU - Sohn, So Young

AU - Lee, Won Sang

AU - Ju, Yong Han

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - Academic inventors tend to lack the ability of valuing technologies in their areas. We apply classification tree analysis to discover different perspectives of Willingness to Pay (WTP) and Sell (WTS) of academic inventors when valuing their patents and technologies. Predictor factors considered are development environment, technology characteristics, ownership and patenting policy, and technology transfer characteristics. According to the result of Korean student data, WTS and WTP are differently perceived for the same technology: WTP is higher than WTS for the low valued technologies. The ownership policy, scalability and degree of innovation of technology, among the discovery of significant factors on WTS and WTP, are mainly considered as the important factors on WTS and WTP. From the finding of this research, we provide the policy implication on academic patenting and its ownership for further development of academic patents.

AB - Academic inventors tend to lack the ability of valuing technologies in their areas. We apply classification tree analysis to discover different perspectives of Willingness to Pay (WTP) and Sell (WTS) of academic inventors when valuing their patents and technologies. Predictor factors considered are development environment, technology characteristics, ownership and patenting policy, and technology transfer characteristics. According to the result of Korean student data, WTS and WTP are differently perceived for the same technology: WTP is higher than WTS for the low valued technologies. The ownership policy, scalability and degree of innovation of technology, among the discovery of significant factors on WTS and WTP, are mainly considered as the important factors on WTS and WTP. From the finding of this research, we provide the policy implication on academic patenting and its ownership for further development of academic patents.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84870538612&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84870538612&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.technovation.2012.10.003

DO - 10.1016/j.technovation.2012.10.003

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84870538612

VL - 33

SP - 13

EP - 24

JO - Technovation

JF - Technovation

SN - 0166-4972

IS - 1

ER -