Virtue politics and political leadership: A confucian rejoinder to Hanfeizi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the Confucian tradition, the ideal government is called benevolent government (ren zheng), central to which is the ruler's parental love toward his people who he deems as his children. Hanfeizi criticized this seemingly innocent political idea by pointing out that (1) not only is the state not a family but even within the family parental love is short of making the children orderly and (2) ren as love inevitably results in the ruin of the state because it confuses what is right/meritorious with what is not, thus disrupts the legal system. In this paper, I defend Confucian virtue politics against Hanfeizi's criticisms. I argue that by failing to grasp the complex nature of ren that encompasses both emotion (ren as love) and moral virtue (ren as filiality), Hanfeizi also failed to understand the actual process in which the ruler's parental love is extended to the people.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)177-197
Number of pages21
JournalAsian Philosophy
Volume22
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012 May 1

Fingerprint

Political Leadership
Ren
Confucian
Ruler
Government
Criticism
Emotion
Legal System
Ruin
Moral Virtue
Political Ideas

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Religious studies
  • Philosophy

Cite this

@article{66fe1eb5b9ff4edb9258e9a341c4bcfa,
title = "Virtue politics and political leadership: A confucian rejoinder to Hanfeizi",
abstract = "In the Confucian tradition, the ideal government is called benevolent government (ren zheng), central to which is the ruler's parental love toward his people who he deems as his children. Hanfeizi criticized this seemingly innocent political idea by pointing out that (1) not only is the state not a family but even within the family parental love is short of making the children orderly and (2) ren as love inevitably results in the ruin of the state because it confuses what is right/meritorious with what is not, thus disrupts the legal system. In this paper, I defend Confucian virtue politics against Hanfeizi's criticisms. I argue that by failing to grasp the complex nature of ren that encompasses both emotion (ren as love) and moral virtue (ren as filiality), Hanfeizi also failed to understand the actual process in which the ruler's parental love is extended to the people.",
author = "Sungmoon Kim",
year = "2012",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/09552367.2012.692977",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "177--197",
journal = "Asian Philosophy",
issn = "0955-2367",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

Virtue politics and political leadership : A confucian rejoinder to Hanfeizi. / Kim, Sungmoon.

In: Asian Philosophy, Vol. 22, No. 2, 01.05.2012, p. 177-197.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Virtue politics and political leadership

T2 - A confucian rejoinder to Hanfeizi

AU - Kim, Sungmoon

PY - 2012/5/1

Y1 - 2012/5/1

N2 - In the Confucian tradition, the ideal government is called benevolent government (ren zheng), central to which is the ruler's parental love toward his people who he deems as his children. Hanfeizi criticized this seemingly innocent political idea by pointing out that (1) not only is the state not a family but even within the family parental love is short of making the children orderly and (2) ren as love inevitably results in the ruin of the state because it confuses what is right/meritorious with what is not, thus disrupts the legal system. In this paper, I defend Confucian virtue politics against Hanfeizi's criticisms. I argue that by failing to grasp the complex nature of ren that encompasses both emotion (ren as love) and moral virtue (ren as filiality), Hanfeizi also failed to understand the actual process in which the ruler's parental love is extended to the people.

AB - In the Confucian tradition, the ideal government is called benevolent government (ren zheng), central to which is the ruler's parental love toward his people who he deems as his children. Hanfeizi criticized this seemingly innocent political idea by pointing out that (1) not only is the state not a family but even within the family parental love is short of making the children orderly and (2) ren as love inevitably results in the ruin of the state because it confuses what is right/meritorious with what is not, thus disrupts the legal system. In this paper, I defend Confucian virtue politics against Hanfeizi's criticisms. I argue that by failing to grasp the complex nature of ren that encompasses both emotion (ren as love) and moral virtue (ren as filiality), Hanfeizi also failed to understand the actual process in which the ruler's parental love is extended to the people.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84863573721&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84863573721&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09552367.2012.692977

DO - 10.1080/09552367.2012.692977

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84863573721

VL - 22

SP - 177

EP - 197

JO - Asian Philosophy

JF - Asian Philosophy

SN - 0955-2367

IS - 2

ER -