Waging War for the Righteous: William Eaton on Enlightenment, Empire, and Coup d’état in the First Barbary War, 1801–1805

C. B. Bow

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The Ottoman provinces of Tripoli, Algiers, Tunis, and the independent sultanate of Morocco, known as Barbary States, terrorized merchant ships with piracy of cargoes and enslavement of their sailors throughout the early modern period. Barbary privateers, known as corsairs, justified their selective targeting of ‘kafir’ or ‘infidel’ merchant ships as waging ‘sea jihad’. Agents of empire struggled to reconcile principles of ‘just war’ in the natural law tradition with the negotiated payment of Barbary tributes for unobstructed passage through the Mediterranean. Resolving this Barbary threat by way of war or tribute involved American interests after 1783. This article examines the ways in which William Eaton, as the United States Consul for Tunis, intervened between Enlightenment and imperial responses to Barbary piracy. Eaton defied Thomas Jefferson’s foreign policies by engineering the first American attempt at coup d’état in a foreign government. In doing so, Eaton’s strategy of military interventionism offered an alternative to perennial Enlightenment and imperial designs for war and peace in the Islamic world.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)692-709
Number of pages18
JournalHistory
Volume101
Issue number348
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Dec 1

Fingerprint

Enlightenment
Coup
Piracy
Tunis
Merchants
Ship
Jihad
Just War
Islamic World
Infidel
Thomas Jefferson
Sailors
Kafir
Threat
Consuls
Interventionism
Morocco
Enslavement
Military
Natural Law

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • History

Cite this

@article{ae7d4db8d04245a2bcfef19bb3071f93,
title = "Waging War for the Righteous: William Eaton on Enlightenment, Empire, and Coup d’{\'e}tat in the First Barbary War, 1801–1805",
abstract = "The Ottoman provinces of Tripoli, Algiers, Tunis, and the independent sultanate of Morocco, known as Barbary States, terrorized merchant ships with piracy of cargoes and enslavement of their sailors throughout the early modern period. Barbary privateers, known as corsairs, justified their selective targeting of ‘kafir’ or ‘infidel’ merchant ships as waging ‘sea jihad’. Agents of empire struggled to reconcile principles of ‘just war’ in the natural law tradition with the negotiated payment of Barbary tributes for unobstructed passage through the Mediterranean. Resolving this Barbary threat by way of war or tribute involved American interests after 1783. This article examines the ways in which William Eaton, as the United States Consul for Tunis, intervened between Enlightenment and imperial responses to Barbary piracy. Eaton defied Thomas Jefferson’s foreign policies by engineering the first American attempt at coup d’{\'e}tat in a foreign government. In doing so, Eaton’s strategy of military interventionism offered an alternative to perennial Enlightenment and imperial designs for war and peace in the Islamic world.",
author = "Bow, {C. B.}",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/1468-229X.12324",
language = "English",
volume = "101",
pages = "692--709",
journal = "History",
issn = "0018-2648",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "348",

}

Waging War for the Righteous : William Eaton on Enlightenment, Empire, and Coup d’état in the First Barbary War, 1801–1805. / Bow, C. B.

In: History, Vol. 101, No. 348, 01.12.2016, p. 692-709.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Waging War for the Righteous

T2 - William Eaton on Enlightenment, Empire, and Coup d’état in the First Barbary War, 1801–1805

AU - Bow, C. B.

PY - 2016/12/1

Y1 - 2016/12/1

N2 - The Ottoman provinces of Tripoli, Algiers, Tunis, and the independent sultanate of Morocco, known as Barbary States, terrorized merchant ships with piracy of cargoes and enslavement of their sailors throughout the early modern period. Barbary privateers, known as corsairs, justified their selective targeting of ‘kafir’ or ‘infidel’ merchant ships as waging ‘sea jihad’. Agents of empire struggled to reconcile principles of ‘just war’ in the natural law tradition with the negotiated payment of Barbary tributes for unobstructed passage through the Mediterranean. Resolving this Barbary threat by way of war or tribute involved American interests after 1783. This article examines the ways in which William Eaton, as the United States Consul for Tunis, intervened between Enlightenment and imperial responses to Barbary piracy. Eaton defied Thomas Jefferson’s foreign policies by engineering the first American attempt at coup d’état in a foreign government. In doing so, Eaton’s strategy of military interventionism offered an alternative to perennial Enlightenment and imperial designs for war and peace in the Islamic world.

AB - The Ottoman provinces of Tripoli, Algiers, Tunis, and the independent sultanate of Morocco, known as Barbary States, terrorized merchant ships with piracy of cargoes and enslavement of their sailors throughout the early modern period. Barbary privateers, known as corsairs, justified their selective targeting of ‘kafir’ or ‘infidel’ merchant ships as waging ‘sea jihad’. Agents of empire struggled to reconcile principles of ‘just war’ in the natural law tradition with the negotiated payment of Barbary tributes for unobstructed passage through the Mediterranean. Resolving this Barbary threat by way of war or tribute involved American interests after 1783. This article examines the ways in which William Eaton, as the United States Consul for Tunis, intervened between Enlightenment and imperial responses to Barbary piracy. Eaton defied Thomas Jefferson’s foreign policies by engineering the first American attempt at coup d’état in a foreign government. In doing so, Eaton’s strategy of military interventionism offered an alternative to perennial Enlightenment and imperial designs for war and peace in the Islamic world.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85007004127&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85007004127&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1468-229X.12324

DO - 10.1111/1468-229X.12324

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85007004127

VL - 101

SP - 692

EP - 709

JO - History

JF - History

SN - 0018-2648

IS - 348

ER -