What is the best practical survey method for the comparative assessment of palliative care services: Results from a national quality assessment project in Korea

Dong Wook Shin, Ji Eun Choi, Jung Hoe Kim, Ji Soo Joo, Jin Young Choi, Jina Kang, Young Ji Baek, Jong Hyock Park, Euncheol Park

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Context: There is an increasing need for the comparative assessment of palliative care services; however, few systematic empirical studies have been performed to determine the most feasible, representative, efficient survey method. Objectives: To investigate the feasibility, representativeness, and efficiency of several survey methods. Methods: This study was performed as a part of a national initiative to develop a system to evaluate the quality of palliative care services. Three separate but related surveys of patients, caregivers, and bereaved family members were conducted. These surveys were designed to simulate an independent assessment in a nationwide quality evaluation project. Results: The effective response rates for the patient, caregiver, and bereavement surveys were 30.4% (105 of 344), 46.5% (160 of 344), and 20.9% (501 of 2398), respectively. Subjects who responded to the patient and caregiver surveys were likely to have better physical and mental conditions, whereas subjects who responded to the bereaved family survey did not differ significantly from nonrespondents in regard to patient characteristics, except for a small difference in patient gender (females: 47.2% vs. 41.7%, P = 0.028). The average number of responses per institution was 3.2, 4.8, and 15.2, respectively. The cost of the patient and caregiver surveys was much higher than the cost of the bereaved family member survey. Conclusion: There were significant differences between the three methods. Despite the low response rate, our findings suggest that the bereaved family member survey has strengths in terms of feasibility and efficiency, and could be considered as a practical option for the comparative assessment of palliative care services by an independent body.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)251-264
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Pain and Symptom Management
Volume42
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011 Aug 1

Fingerprint

Korea
Palliative Care
Caregivers
Surveys and Questionnaires
Costs and Cost Analysis
Bereavement
Needs Assessment
Quality of Health Care

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Nursing(all)
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Shin, Dong Wook ; Choi, Ji Eun ; Kim, Jung Hoe ; Joo, Ji Soo ; Choi, Jin Young ; Kang, Jina ; Baek, Young Ji ; Park, Jong Hyock ; Park, Euncheol. / What is the best practical survey method for the comparative assessment of palliative care services : Results from a national quality assessment project in Korea. In: Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 2011 ; Vol. 42, No. 2. pp. 251-264.
@article{e2029396200f432580cb92cd1277dcc1,
title = "What is the best practical survey method for the comparative assessment of palliative care services: Results from a national quality assessment project in Korea",
abstract = "Context: There is an increasing need for the comparative assessment of palliative care services; however, few systematic empirical studies have been performed to determine the most feasible, representative, efficient survey method. Objectives: To investigate the feasibility, representativeness, and efficiency of several survey methods. Methods: This study was performed as a part of a national initiative to develop a system to evaluate the quality of palliative care services. Three separate but related surveys of patients, caregivers, and bereaved family members were conducted. These surveys were designed to simulate an independent assessment in a nationwide quality evaluation project. Results: The effective response rates for the patient, caregiver, and bereavement surveys were 30.4{\%} (105 of 344), 46.5{\%} (160 of 344), and 20.9{\%} (501 of 2398), respectively. Subjects who responded to the patient and caregiver surveys were likely to have better physical and mental conditions, whereas subjects who responded to the bereaved family survey did not differ significantly from nonrespondents in regard to patient characteristics, except for a small difference in patient gender (females: 47.2{\%} vs. 41.7{\%}, P = 0.028). The average number of responses per institution was 3.2, 4.8, and 15.2, respectively. The cost of the patient and caregiver surveys was much higher than the cost of the bereaved family member survey. Conclusion: There were significant differences between the three methods. Despite the low response rate, our findings suggest that the bereaved family member survey has strengths in terms of feasibility and efficiency, and could be considered as a practical option for the comparative assessment of palliative care services by an independent body.",
author = "Shin, {Dong Wook} and Choi, {Ji Eun} and Kim, {Jung Hoe} and Joo, {Ji Soo} and Choi, {Jin Young} and Jina Kang and Baek, {Young Ji} and Park, {Jong Hyock} and Euncheol Park",
year = "2011",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.11.023",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "251--264",
journal = "Journal of Pain and Symptom Management",
issn = "0885-3924",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "2",

}

What is the best practical survey method for the comparative assessment of palliative care services : Results from a national quality assessment project in Korea. / Shin, Dong Wook; Choi, Ji Eun; Kim, Jung Hoe; Joo, Ji Soo; Choi, Jin Young; Kang, Jina; Baek, Young Ji; Park, Jong Hyock; Park, Euncheol.

In: Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, Vol. 42, No. 2, 01.08.2011, p. 251-264.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - What is the best practical survey method for the comparative assessment of palliative care services

T2 - Results from a national quality assessment project in Korea

AU - Shin, Dong Wook

AU - Choi, Ji Eun

AU - Kim, Jung Hoe

AU - Joo, Ji Soo

AU - Choi, Jin Young

AU - Kang, Jina

AU - Baek, Young Ji

AU - Park, Jong Hyock

AU - Park, Euncheol

PY - 2011/8/1

Y1 - 2011/8/1

N2 - Context: There is an increasing need for the comparative assessment of palliative care services; however, few systematic empirical studies have been performed to determine the most feasible, representative, efficient survey method. Objectives: To investigate the feasibility, representativeness, and efficiency of several survey methods. Methods: This study was performed as a part of a national initiative to develop a system to evaluate the quality of palliative care services. Three separate but related surveys of patients, caregivers, and bereaved family members were conducted. These surveys were designed to simulate an independent assessment in a nationwide quality evaluation project. Results: The effective response rates for the patient, caregiver, and bereavement surveys were 30.4% (105 of 344), 46.5% (160 of 344), and 20.9% (501 of 2398), respectively. Subjects who responded to the patient and caregiver surveys were likely to have better physical and mental conditions, whereas subjects who responded to the bereaved family survey did not differ significantly from nonrespondents in regard to patient characteristics, except for a small difference in patient gender (females: 47.2% vs. 41.7%, P = 0.028). The average number of responses per institution was 3.2, 4.8, and 15.2, respectively. The cost of the patient and caregiver surveys was much higher than the cost of the bereaved family member survey. Conclusion: There were significant differences between the three methods. Despite the low response rate, our findings suggest that the bereaved family member survey has strengths in terms of feasibility and efficiency, and could be considered as a practical option for the comparative assessment of palliative care services by an independent body.

AB - Context: There is an increasing need for the comparative assessment of palliative care services; however, few systematic empirical studies have been performed to determine the most feasible, representative, efficient survey method. Objectives: To investigate the feasibility, representativeness, and efficiency of several survey methods. Methods: This study was performed as a part of a national initiative to develop a system to evaluate the quality of palliative care services. Three separate but related surveys of patients, caregivers, and bereaved family members were conducted. These surveys were designed to simulate an independent assessment in a nationwide quality evaluation project. Results: The effective response rates for the patient, caregiver, and bereavement surveys were 30.4% (105 of 344), 46.5% (160 of 344), and 20.9% (501 of 2398), respectively. Subjects who responded to the patient and caregiver surveys were likely to have better physical and mental conditions, whereas subjects who responded to the bereaved family survey did not differ significantly from nonrespondents in regard to patient characteristics, except for a small difference in patient gender (females: 47.2% vs. 41.7%, P = 0.028). The average number of responses per institution was 3.2, 4.8, and 15.2, respectively. The cost of the patient and caregiver surveys was much higher than the cost of the bereaved family member survey. Conclusion: There were significant differences between the three methods. Despite the low response rate, our findings suggest that the bereaved family member survey has strengths in terms of feasibility and efficiency, and could be considered as a practical option for the comparative assessment of palliative care services by an independent body.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79961010137&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79961010137&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.11.023

DO - 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.11.023

M3 - Article

C2 - 21458215

AN - SCOPUS:79961010137

VL - 42

SP - 251

EP - 264

JO - Journal of Pain and Symptom Management

JF - Journal of Pain and Symptom Management

SN - 0885-3924

IS - 2

ER -