Which candidates do the public discuss online in an election campaign? The use of social media by 2012 presidential candidates and its impact on candidate salience

Sounman Hong, Daniel Nadler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

93 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The effects of new communication technologies on election campaigns, and the effectiveness of media-centered campaign strategies more broadly, remain ongoing subjects for debate in political science. This study provides some of the first empirical evidence about the potential impact of social media on the 2012 U.S. presidential elections, by testing the association between "candidate salience" and the candidates' level of engagement in online social media sphere. We define "candidate salience" as the extent to which candidates are discussed online by the public in an election campaign, and have selected the number of mentions presidential candidates receive on the social media site, Twitter, as means of quantifying their salience. This strategy allows us to examine whether social media, which is widely recognized as disruptive in the broader economic and social domains, has the potential to change the traditional dynamics of U.S. election campaigns. We find that while social media does substantially expand the possible modes and methods of election campaigning, high levels of social media activity on the part of presidential candidates have, as of yet, resulted in minimal effects on the amount of public attention they receive online.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)455-461
Number of pages7
JournalGovernment Information Quarterly
Volume29
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012 Oct 1

Fingerprint

election campaign
social media
candidacy
twitter
presidential election
political science
new technology
communication technology
campaign
election
evidence
economics

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Library and Information Sciences
  • Law

Cite this

@article{7722eedfae2a4da08c93318504c17613,
title = "Which candidates do the public discuss online in an election campaign?: The use of social media by 2012 presidential candidates and its impact on candidate salience",
abstract = "The effects of new communication technologies on election campaigns, and the effectiveness of media-centered campaign strategies more broadly, remain ongoing subjects for debate in political science. This study provides some of the first empirical evidence about the potential impact of social media on the 2012 U.S. presidential elections, by testing the association between {"}candidate salience{"} and the candidates' level of engagement in online social media sphere. We define {"}candidate salience{"} as the extent to which candidates are discussed online by the public in an election campaign, and have selected the number of mentions presidential candidates receive on the social media site, Twitter, as means of quantifying their salience. This strategy allows us to examine whether social media, which is widely recognized as disruptive in the broader economic and social domains, has the potential to change the traditional dynamics of U.S. election campaigns. We find that while social media does substantially expand the possible modes and methods of election campaigning, high levels of social media activity on the part of presidential candidates have, as of yet, resulted in minimal effects on the amount of public attention they receive online.",
author = "Sounman Hong and Daniel Nadler",
year = "2012",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.004",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "455--461",
journal = "Government Information Quarterly",
issn = "0740-624X",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Which candidates do the public discuss online in an election campaign?

T2 - The use of social media by 2012 presidential candidates and its impact on candidate salience

AU - Hong, Sounman

AU - Nadler, Daniel

PY - 2012/10/1

Y1 - 2012/10/1

N2 - The effects of new communication technologies on election campaigns, and the effectiveness of media-centered campaign strategies more broadly, remain ongoing subjects for debate in political science. This study provides some of the first empirical evidence about the potential impact of social media on the 2012 U.S. presidential elections, by testing the association between "candidate salience" and the candidates' level of engagement in online social media sphere. We define "candidate salience" as the extent to which candidates are discussed online by the public in an election campaign, and have selected the number of mentions presidential candidates receive on the social media site, Twitter, as means of quantifying their salience. This strategy allows us to examine whether social media, which is widely recognized as disruptive in the broader economic and social domains, has the potential to change the traditional dynamics of U.S. election campaigns. We find that while social media does substantially expand the possible modes and methods of election campaigning, high levels of social media activity on the part of presidential candidates have, as of yet, resulted in minimal effects on the amount of public attention they receive online.

AB - The effects of new communication technologies on election campaigns, and the effectiveness of media-centered campaign strategies more broadly, remain ongoing subjects for debate in political science. This study provides some of the first empirical evidence about the potential impact of social media on the 2012 U.S. presidential elections, by testing the association between "candidate salience" and the candidates' level of engagement in online social media sphere. We define "candidate salience" as the extent to which candidates are discussed online by the public in an election campaign, and have selected the number of mentions presidential candidates receive on the social media site, Twitter, as means of quantifying their salience. This strategy allows us to examine whether social media, which is widely recognized as disruptive in the broader economic and social domains, has the potential to change the traditional dynamics of U.S. election campaigns. We find that while social media does substantially expand the possible modes and methods of election campaigning, high levels of social media activity on the part of presidential candidates have, as of yet, resulted in minimal effects on the amount of public attention they receive online.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84866283707&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84866283707&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.004

DO - 10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.004

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84866283707

VL - 29

SP - 455

EP - 461

JO - Government Information Quarterly

JF - Government Information Quarterly

SN - 0740-624X

IS - 4

ER -